CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 1 février 2007

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s5CB9E8AB { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 94 February 2007 Matveyev v. Russia (dec.) - 26601/02 Decision 1.2.2007 [Section I] Article 3 of Protocol No. 7 Compensation Inability to claim non-pecuniary damage for wrongful conviction: admissible   The applicant lost his job and served a two-year prison sentence after being wrongfully convicted by a district court in 1981 of forging a postal stamp. His conviction was eventually quashed eighteen years later in supervisory-review proceedings, after a regional court had held that there was no indication that a crime had been committed. The applicant sought compensation. However, although he received an award in respect of pecuniary damage, his claim for non-pecuniary damage was dismissed on the ground that at the time of his conviction there was no statutory basis in domestic law for such a claim. Admissible : The Government’s objection of lack of jurisdiction ratione temporis was joined to the merits.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes