CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 19 décembre 2006

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s5CB9E8AB { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 92 December 2006 Adamiak v. Poland - 20758/03 Judgment 19.12.2006 [Section IV] Article 5 Article 5-3 Length of pre-trial detention Pre-trial detention lasting five years in proceedings concerning import and trafficking of drugs by an organised criminal group: violation   Facts: The applicant was detained pending trial for approximately five years in connection with proceedings concerning drug smuggling and trafficking by a large criminal organisation. He was sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment for conspiracy to traffic drugs. Law : The Government contended in particular that the offence in question – drug trafficking – required thorough investigation and involved the production of complex evidence. The Court considered that the reasons given by the domestic courts to justify extending the applicant’s detention – the nature of the offence, the heavy sentence which it carried, the complexity of the case and the risk that the applicant might abscond and obstruct the course of justice – had been insufficient with the passage of time to justify depriving him of his liberty for such a long period. The fact that the criminal proceedings related to an organised criminal group was not sufficient reason for a period of pre-trial detention lasting five years. Conclusion : violation (unanimously). See Chraidi v. Germany (no. 65655/01), judgment of 26 October 2006, Information Note No.   90. Article 41 – EUR 1,500 for non-pecuniary damage.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes