CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 9 novembre 2004
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-4120
- Date
- 9 novembre 2004
- Publication
- 9 novembre 2004
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleViolation of Art. 6-1 with regard to the length of the proceedings;Violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to the right to a court;Violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to impartiality;Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses partial award
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 69 November 2004 Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine - 41984/98 Judgment 9.11.2004 [Section II] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Impartial tribunal Impartiality of judge participating in decision on an application for review lodged by him: violation Facts : In 1994 the District Court delivered a judgment favourable to the applicant in relation to her status as a relief worker during the disaster at the Chernobyl nuclear plant. This status, which entitled the applicant to a number of benefits, was contested by the authorities. In 2000 the Deputy President of the Regional Court, acting on behalf of the regional authorities, lodged a protest against the decision of the District Court of 1994, which had become final and binding. The Presidium of the Regional Court allowed the protest and quashed the 1994 decision in the applicant’s favour. Law : Article 6 § 1 (impartial tribunal) – As the Deputy President of the Regional Court who lodged the protest was also a member of the Presidium of the Regional Court which examined the protest, this was incompatible with the required “subjective impartiality” of a judge, who could not be both plaintiff and judge in his own case. Conclusion : violation (unanimously).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 9 novembre 2004
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-4120
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel