CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 17 juin 2004

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 65 June 2004 Zisis v. Greece (dec.) - 77658/01 Decision 17.6.2004 [Section I] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Civil rights and obligations Administrative proceedings brought by non-commissioned officer responsible for dealing with postal orders: admissible The applicant is a serving non-commissioned officer in the army. He is assigned to the Army Postal Service, which is responsible for processing and distributing military mail between the army’s different sections. This postal service, which is separate from the civilian postal service, was set up to ensure that the distribution of mail which is considered confidential or pertaining to matters of national security was entrusted only to armed forces personnel, who are subject to stricter disciplinary norms than civilian officials. The applicant holds a managerial post in a local military post office. He is responsible for dealing with the army’s postal orders. In this capacity, he applied for the risk allowance for managerial staff.The administrative courts found that the applicant was primarily and exclusively involved in carrying out managerial duties, and accordingly held that he was entitled to receive the allowance. Admissible under Article 6 (reasonable time), the question of the applicability of this Article being joined to the merits.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes