CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 2 octobre 2003
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-4689
- Date
- 2 octobre 2003
- Publication
- 2 octobre 2003
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officiellePecuniary damage - financial award;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings;Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 57 October 2003 Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine - 48553/99 Judgment 2.10.2003 [Section IV] Article 41 Just satisfaction In a judgment of 25 July 2002, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 in that the applicant company’s had not had a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal. The Court also held that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, since the respondent State had failed in its obligation to secure to the applicant company the effective enjoyment of its right of property. The Court reserved the question of the application of Article 41. Article 41 – Making its assessment on an equitable basis, the Court awarded 500,000 euros for the pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant company as a result of the loss of real opportunities to manage in practice the company of which it was a partial owner and to control the latter’s assets, and 75,000 euros for non-pecuniary damage resulting from the situation of prolonged uncertainty in which the applicant company had been placed. The Court awarded 50,000 euros in respect of costs and expenses incurred in the proceedings before the national courts and before the Court.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 2 octobre 2003
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-4689
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel