CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 29 avril 2003
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-4954
- Date
- 29 avril 2003
- Publication
- 29 avril 2003
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 52 April 2003 Sevgi Erdoğan v. Turkey - 28492/95 Judgment 29.4.2003 [Section IV] Article 37 Article 37-1-c Continued examination not justified Death of applicant: struck out The applicant complained of violence and ill-treatment at the hands of the security forces. She died while her application was being examined by the Court. Only the Counsel representing her before the Court requested that the proceedings be continued. On the basis of the information provided by the applicant's Counsel, it was not possible to contact a close relative or legal heir of the applicant. Her Counsel stated that the applicant's deceased husband's mother wished to proceed with the application, but failed to provide either a duly completed mandate or a document showing that intention. The applicant's Counsel cannot, as such, claim a legitimate interest – whether material or non-material – in continuing the proceedings on his own behalf. Since it has been impossible to establish any contact with one of the applicant's close relatives or legal heirs, the applicant's representative cannot continue the proceedings before the Court. Accordingly, it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the case.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 29 avril 2003
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-4954
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel