CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 28 janvier 2003
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-5030
- Date
- 28 janvier 2003
- Publication
- 28 janvier 2003
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleInadmissible
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 49 January 2003 Burg and Others v. France (dec.) - 34763/02 Decision 28.1.2003 [Section II] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Dismissal of appeal on points of law on basis that the grounds of appeal were not such as to warrant admissibility: inadmissible In a dispute with their employer, the applicants were successful at first instance before the Labour Court.   When the employer appealed, the Appeal court set the judgment aside.   The Social Chamber of the Court of Cassation rejected an appeal on a point of law brought by the applicants, on the ground that their argument would not succeed in the appeal proceedings (Article L. 131-6 of the Judicial Code).   Inadmissible under Article 6 § 1:   The Court has ruled that Article 6 does not require that detailed reasons be given for decisions in which an appeal court, on the basis of a specific legal provision, dismisses an appeal as standing no chance of succeeding, and this case-law has already been applied to administrative court proceedings in France.   There is no reason why it should not be applied to the ordinary courts as well, when the latter follow a similar procedure: manifestly ill-founded.   [This decision extends application of the case-law derived from Société anonyme Immeuble Groupe Kosser v. France (dec.), No. 38748/97, judgment of 9 March 1999, and Latournerie v. France (dec.), No. 50321/99, decision of 10 December 2002, which concerned Section 11 of the Act of 31 December 1987, introducing a prior review procedure for appeals on points of law to the Conseil d’Etat .]   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 28 janvier 2003
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-5030
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel