CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 28 mai 2002
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-5372
- Date
- 28 mai 2002
- Publication
- 28 mai 2002
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officiellePecuniary damage - financial award;Non-pecuniary damage - financial award;Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings;Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 42 May 2002 Beyeler v. Italy [GC] - 33202/96 Judgment 28.5.2002 [GC] Article 41 Just satisfaction In a judgment of 5 January 2000 the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, as the applicant had had to bear a disproportionate and excessive burden resulting from the circumstances in which the State exercised its right of pre-emption in respect of a painting which the applicant had acquired. The Court reserved the question of just satisfaction. Article 41 – Having regard to the diversity of factors to be taken into consideration for the purposes of calculating the damage and to the nature of the case, the Court deemed it appropriate to fix, on an equitable basis, an aggregate sum which took account of the various considerations it had identified. Accordingly, the Court decided to award the applicant 1,300,000 euros (EUR) in compensation for the damage sustained, including ancillary costs and costs incurred before the domestic courts. It also awarded 55,000 euros in respect of the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Court.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 28 mai 2002
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-5372
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel