CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 27 septembre 2001

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 34 September 2001 Demuth v. Switzerland (dec.) - 38743/97 Decision 27.9.2001 [Section II] Article 10 Article 10-1 Licensing of broadcasting enterprises Refusal to grant licence to broadcast television channel: admissible The applicant intended to set up a television channel to be broadcast via the cable network in Switzerland, Austria and Germany. The programmes of the channel were to be limited to cars and related issues, ranging from car equipment to environmental topics. The applicant filed with the Government a request for a licence to broadcast. The Federal Council rejected it, holding that there was no right under domestic law or the Convention to obtain a licence to broadcast. It considered that electronic media should contribute to a culture of communication and a democratic discourse. It added that segment programmes centred on specific issues could not serve the purpose of the culture of communication which is based on a comprehensive and broadly based democratic discourse. Admissible under Article 10.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes