CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 11 septembre 2001
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-5518
- Date
- 11 septembre 2001
- Publication
- 11 septembre 2001
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleAdmissible
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 34 September 2001 Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) - 42295/98 Decision 11.9.2001 [Section III] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Tips included in cheque and credit card payments counted as remuneration for the purpose of minimum wage regulation: admissible The applicants were waiters at the material time. When they received a tip from a customer, the money gathered was later distributed proportionately among all the waiters. As a result of a new tax system, tips paid by customers by including the amount in cheque or credit card vouchers were paid over to their employer, who distributed an equivalent amount among the waiters, in a proportion which he decided. The sum which each of the applicants received featured in their wage slip as “additional pay”. At the relevant time, a minimum remuneration was provided by law for waiters. As the weekly share of the applicants' tips was regularly superior to the statutory minimum wage, they decided to challenge their employer’s right to count cheque or credit card tips as part of the minimum remuneration. The courts however found against the applicants both at first instance and at appeal, and leave to appeal to the House of Lords was refused. Admissible under Article 1 of Protocol N° 1 and Article 14.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 11 septembre 2001
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-5518
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel