CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 20 avril 1999
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-6282
- Date
- 20 avril 1999
- Publication
- 20 avril 1999
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleAdmissible
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 5 April 1999 Khan v. the United Kingdom (dec.) - 35394/97 Decision 20.4.1999 [Section III] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Admissibility in criminal proceedings of evidence improperly obtained by a listening device installed by the police in a private house: admissible Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Listening device installed by the police in a private house: admissible The applicant was convicted of drug trafficking on the sole ground of evidence improperly obtained by a listening device installed by the police on the premises of a friend of the applicant. He appealed against the conviction, disputing the admissibility of the tape recordings as evidence. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal but certified as a point of law of general importance the question of whether tape recorded conversations, obtained by a listening device attached by the police to a private house, were admissible in a criminal trial. The applicant was granted leave to appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeal dismissing his appeal against conviction. However, the House of Lords dismissed his appeal on points of law. Admissible under Articles 6, 8 and 13. [The Section decided that a hearing should be held as regards the issue under Article 6 § 1 (fair hearing).]   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 20 avril 1999
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-6282
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel