CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 21 septembre 1999
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-6588
- Date
- 21 septembre 1999
- Publication
- 21 septembre 1999
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleAdmissible
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 10 September 1999 Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland (dec.) - 34720/97 Decision 21.9.1999 [Section IV] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Self-incrimination - applicants convicted for having refused to answer questions asked by the police: admissible Article 6-2 Presumption of innocence Self-incrimination - applicants convicted for not having refused to answer questions asked by the police: admissible [This summary also covers the decision of the case Quinn v. Ireland (dec.), no. 36887/97, 21 September 1999.] The three applicants were arrested on suspicion of serious terrorist offences. Their arrests were based on the suspicion that they belonged to an illegal paramilitary organisation, the IRA. After having been cautioned by police officers that they had the right to remain silent, they were each requested to give details concerning their whereabouts at the time of the relevant offences. All three refused to provide the information requested by the police. As a consequence, they were convicted and sentenced under Section 52 of the Offences Against the State Act 1939 to six months’ imprisonment for failure to provide information requested by the police. Admissible under Articles 6 § 1 (self-incrimination) and 6 § 2 (presumption of innocence), and   10 (right not to impart information) and also under Article 8 (private life) in the Heaney and McGuinness application.     © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 21 septembre 1999
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-6588
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel