CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 23 mars 2000
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-6741
- Date
- 23 mars 2000
- Publication
- 23 mars 2000
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officiellePartly admissible;Partly inadmissible
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 16 March 2000 Wettstein v. Switzerland (dec.) - 33958/96 Decision 23.3.2000 [Section II] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Impartial tribunal Lawyer of opposing party simultaneously acting as judge in other proceedings to which the applicant is party: admissible The applicant was involved in three unrelated real property proceedings. In one set of proceedings the opposing party was represented by lawyer R., and in another by lawyer W. R. and W., together with a third lawyer, L., had their offices in the same premises. R. and L. also acted as part-time administrative judges at the Administrative Court and were on the bench of judges which rejected the applicant’s action in the third set of proceedings. The proceedings in which R. was representing the opposing party were still pending before the Federal Court when the applicant instituted the last set of proceedings. Admissible under Article 6 § 1 (impartial tribunal).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 23 mars 2000
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-6741
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel