CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 21 mars 2000
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-6743
- Date
- 21 mars 2000
- Publication
- 21 mars 2000
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list (friendly settlement)
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 16 March 2000 J.K. v. Slovakia - 29021/95 Judgment 21.3.2000 [Section II] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Absence of possibility of court review of conviction by administrative authorities for minor offence: friendly settlement The Local Office found the applicant guilty of a minor offence and fined him 1,000   korunas (SKK). This was upheld by the District Office. The applicant was subsequently fined 1,800 korunas by the Local Office in respect of similar offences and this decision was also upheld by the District Office. At the material time, such decisions could not be reviewed by a court unless the fine exceeded 2,000 korunas (cf. Lauko and Kadubec judgments of 2   September 1998). In October 1998 the Constitutional Court found that the relevant provision was unconstitutional and contrary to Article 6 of the Convention in so far as it excluded court review, as a result of which the provision became ineffective. The parties have reached a friendly settlement providing for payment to the applicant of 5,000   korunas to cover any damages and costs.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 21 mars 2000
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-6743
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel