CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 27 avril 2000

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 17 April 2000 Rotondi v. Italy - 38113/97 Judgment 27.4.2000 [Section II] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of civil proceedings following the finding of a violation due to the length: violation The case concerns the length of proceedings. In an earlier application to the European Commission of Human Rights (no. 24783/94), the Commission had already found a violation of Article 6 because the applicant had not had his case examined within a reasonable time. The present application therefore concerns primarily the period after 13 June 1995. The proceedings therefore lasted more than one year and eight months, for one level of jurisdiction. While this period does not appear excessive in itself, it follows a rather long overall period which had already been found to constitute a violation. Conclusion : violation (6 votes to 1). Article 41 - The Court awarded the applicant 5 million lire (ITL) in respect of non-pecuniary damage.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes