CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 25 mai 2000
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-6954
- Date
- 25 mai 2000
- Publication
- 25 mai 2000
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleStruck out of the list (friendly settlement)
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 18 May 2000 Esposito v. Italy - 20855/92 Judgment 25.5.2000 [Section II] Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Absence of possibility of court review of prefectoral decisions staggering the granting of police assistance in enforcement of eviction orders: friendly settlement Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property Staggering of the granting of police assistance to enforce eviction order: friendly settlement The applicant gave notice to the tenant of an apartment which he owns. By an order which became final in 1986, the first instance judge ( pretore ) formally confirmed the notice and decided that the premises should be vacated by 31 December 1987. The tenant’s appeal was rejected by the Rome court. A bailiff attempted on numerous occasions to evict the tenant but was unsuccessful because the laws on suspension and staggering of enforcement of eviction decisions did not allow the applicant to benefit from police assistance. The tenant vacated the apartment in February 2000. The parties have reached a friendly settlement providing for payment to the applicant of 119,864,000 lire (ITL), made up of 35 million lire in respect of non-pecuniary damage, 74,864,000 lire in respect of pecuniary damage and 10 million lire in respect of costs and expenses.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 25 mai 2000
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-6954
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel