CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 12 octobre 2000

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 23 October 2000 Mancini v. Italy (dec.) - 44955/98 Decision 12.10.2000 [Section II] Article 5 Article 5-1 Lawful arrest or detention Transfer from place of detention on remand to place of compulsory residence 6 days after being ordered: admissible Both applicants and two other people were arrested following an armed robbery. The goods that had been stolen were found in a shop owned by the applicants’ company. The investigating judge placed the applicants under house arrest, from which they were released in December 1996. Suspicion again fell on them after two further armed robberies and they were detained pending trial in December 1997 by order of the investigating judge. They appealed against the order. On 7 January 1998 the division of the relevant court dealing with applications for review of preventive measures ordered their release from pre-trial detention and placed them under house arrest instead, on the ground that the risk of their committing a similar offence was not high enough to justify their detention. However, they were not transferred from the prison where they were being held to their homes until 13 January 1998 because no police officers were available. Admissible under Article 5 § 1 .   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes