CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 7 septembre 1998

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. September 1998 B.B. v. France (striking out) - 30930/96 Judgment 7.9.1998 Article 37 Article 37-1 Striking out applications Risk of Congolese (former Zaïrean) national suffering from Aids being deported to his country of origin where he would not receive appropriate medical treatment: struck out [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions ). Its formatting and structure may therefore differ from the Case-Law Information Note summaries.] No friendly settlement or arrangement in case before Court – however, order constituted an “other fact of a kind to provide a solution of the matter” (Rule 49 § 2 of Rules of Court   A) – in initial application to Convention institutions, applicant’s main argument had been that if he was deported to what had formerly been Zaïre there would be a considerable risk of his being exposed to treatment contrary to Article 3 of Convention, as he would not be able to receive in country of origin treatment his serious medical condition required – risk of violation had ceased as a result of compulsory residence order made against applicant and Government’s undertaking not to deport him – no separate issue arose under Article   8. Furthermore, no reason of public policy to proceed with case. Conclusion: case to be struck out of the list (unanimously).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes