CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 24 avril 1998

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s85F2E5C5 { width:30.44pt; display:inline-block } .s6863D229 { width:26pt; display:inline-block } .sBDAE81C4 { width:27.67pt; display:inline-block } .s49A78FE0 { width:26.55pt; display:inline-block } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. April 1998 Mavronichis v. Cyprus - 28054/95 Judgment 24.4.1998 Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of proceedings instituted to obtain compensation following successful annulment of administrative act rejecting candidature for a public-sector post: violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions). Its formatting and structure may therefore differ from the Case-Law Information Note summaries.] I.   ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION A.   Applicability Compensation proceedings instituted by applicant not concerned with his recruitment to public-sector post – sole aim of civil action was to obtain compensation for damage – having regard to provisions of domestic law, arguable grounds for concluding that right to seek compensation accrued to applicant after he had successfully secured annulment of administrative act – compensation proceedings involved a determination of a purely pecuniary right having a basis in domestic law – private-law features of those proceedings outweighed public-law features. Conclusion : Article 6 § 1 applicable (unanimously). B.   Compliance Reiteration of Court’s case-law on reasonable time requirement – issues raised by compensation proceedings not complex – no steps taken by registry of Supreme Court to deal with applicant’s appeal during a period of four years and two months – delay cannot be excused on account of workload of Supreme Court – excessive delay imputable to authorities. Conclusion : violation (unanimously). II.   ARTICLE 50 OF THE CONVENTION A.   Pecuniary damage: No causal connection between violation of the Convention and alleged pecuniary loss – claim dismissed. B.   Non-pecuniary damage: Sum awarded for anxiety and stress induced by unreasonable length of proceedings. C.   Costs and expenses: Claim allowed in part. Conclusion : respondent State to pay specified sums to applicant for non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses (unanimously).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes