CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 2 septembre 1997

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s85F2E5C5 { width:30.44pt; display:inline-block } .sBDAE81C4 { width:27.67pt; display:inline-block } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. September 1997 Gallo v. Italy - 25575/94 Judgment 2.9.1997 Article 6 Article 6-1 Civil rights and obligations Length of proceedings in the administrative courts: Article 6 § 1 not applicable [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions). Its formatting and structure may therefore differ from the Case-Law Information Note summaries. It also covers the following judgments of 2   September 1997 against Italy: Spurio (23217/94), Zilaghe (25590/94), Laghi (25831/94), Viero (25832/94), Orlandini (25833/94) and Ryllo (25834/94)] I.   SCOPE OF THE CASE ( Gallo ) Complaint relating to Article 14 of Convention: outside scope of case as defined by Commission's decision on admissibility. II.   ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION (“REASONABLE TIME”) Basic distinction in law of many member States of the Council of Europe between civil servants and employees governed by private law – Court has accordingly held that disputes relating to recruitment, careers and termination of service of civil servants are as a general rule outside scope of Article 6 § 1. Applicants sought: declaration that administrative authorities had acted unlawfully ( Spurio ), backdating of pecuniary advantages of a promotion ( Orlandini ), judicial review of administrative authorities’ decision refusing reinstatement in former post ( Ryllo ), or judicial review of one or more decisions of administrative authorities assigning applicants to a particular rank ( Laghi ) or staff category (remaining cases) – they thus raised disputes related to their recruitment, careers or termination of service which did not concern a civil right within meaning of Article 6 § 1 – payment of difference in salary ( Spurio, Viero and Orlandini ) or pecuniary advantages of promotion ( Orlandini only) directly dependent on prior finding that administrative authorities had acted unlawfully. Conclusion : Article 6 § 1 not applicable (eight votes to one).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes