CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 29 mai 1997

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s85F2E5C5 { width:30.44pt; display:inline-block } .s6863D229 { width:26pt; display:inline-block } .sBDAE81C4 { width:27.67pt; display:inline-block } .sC7C396CD { width:24.89pt; display:inline-block } .sE4E38D5F { width:23.77pt; display:inline-block } .s49A78FE0 { width:26.55pt; display:inline-block } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law May 1997 Tsirlis and Kouloumpas v. Greece - 19234/91 and 19233/91 Judgment 29.5.1997 Article 5 Article 5-1 Lawful arrest or detention   Article 5-5 Compensation Detention of Jehovah's Witnesses' ministers following refusal to exempt them from military service: violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions). Its formatting and structure may therefore differ from the Case-Law Information Note summaries.] I.   ARTICLE 5 OF THE CONVENTION A.   Paragraph 1 Lawfulness of applicants' detention to be examined under Article 5 § 1 (a). Section 6 of 1988 Law refers to ministers of all "known religions" - Supreme Administrative Court had acknowledged that Jehovah's Witnesses were to be considered as such - undisputed throughout proceedings that applicants were ministers of that religion   ‑ treatment of applicants discriminatory when compared to ministers of Greek Orthodox Church - failure of military courts to take account of the above resulted in applicants' arbitrary detention contrary to domestic law. Conclusion : violation (unanimously). B.   Paragraph 5 Applicants' detention was unlawful under Article 5 § 1 but applicants were refused compensation by domestic courts. Conclusion : violation (unanimously). II.   ARTICLE 9 OF THE CONVENTION, TAKEN ALONE AND IN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLE   14 Complaints centred around issue of applicants' detention pending administrative decision on applications for exemption - Court already found that applicants' detention was arbitrary under Article   5   §   1. Conclusion :   not necessary to examine complaints (unanimously). III.   ARTICLES 6 § 1 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION Given finding in respect of Article 5 § 5, not necessary to examine complaint under this head. Conclusion :   not necessary to examine complaint (unanimously). IV.   ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION Complaint not substantiated before Court. Conclusion : no violation (unanimously). V.   ARTICLE 50 OF THE CONVENTION A.   Damage: awarded on an equitable basis. B.   Costs and expenses: awarded on an equitable basis. Conclusion : respondent State to pay specified sums to applicants (unanimously).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes