CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 1 avril 2014

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s9FF10068 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .sEB86A30B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 173 April 2014 Luli and Others v. Albania - 64480/09, 64482/09, 12874/10 et al. Judgment 1.4.2014 [Section IV] Article 46 Article 46-2 Execution of judgment Measures of a general character Respondent State required to introduce effective remedy in respect of excessive length of civil proceedings Facts – In their applications to the European Court, the applicants complained under Article 6 §   1 of the Convention of the length of civil proceedings they had brought to determine their property rights. Law – Article 46: The Court found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in respect of the length of the domestic proceedings. It also found, as in two previous cases against Albania*, that there existed no domestic remedy in respect of length-of-proceedings complaints. This demonstrated a serious deficiency in domestic legal proceedings and, indeed, dozens of similar applications were pending before the Court. General measures at the national level were undoubtedly called for including, in particular, a domestic remedy as regards undue length of proceedings. In that connection, the principles set out in Scordino v.   Italy (no.   1) [GC] (36813/97, 29   March 2006, Information Note   85 ) set out the required elements of an effective remedy for excessive length of proceedings, the optimal solution being a combination of a remedy designed to expedite the proceedings and another to afford compensation, although a suitable compensatory remedy alone might suffice. * Gjonbocari and Others v. Albania , 10508/02, 23   October 2007, and Marini v.   Albania , 3738/02, 18   December 2007, Information Note   103 .   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes