CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 18 juillet 1994

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s85F2E5C5 { width:30.44pt; display:inline-block } .s6863D229 { width:26pt; display:inline-block } .sBDAE81C4 { width:27.67pt; display:inline-block } .sC7C396CD { width:24.89pt; display:inline-block } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law July 1994 Karlheinz Schmidt v. Germany - 13580/88 Judgment 18.7.1994 Article 14 Discrimination Obligation imposed solely on men to serve in the fire brigade or pay a financial contribution in lieu: violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s official reports (Series A or Reports of Judgments and Decisions). Its formatting and structure may therefore differ from the Case-Law Information Note summaries.] I.   ARTICLE 14 OF THE CONVENTION TAKEN IN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLE   4 §   3   (D) A.   Applicability Compulsory fire brigade service one of the "normal civic obligations" within the meaning of Article 4 §   3   (d) – obligation to pay levy also fell within scope of that Article on account of its close links with obligation to serve. Conclusion : applicable (unanimously). B.   Compliance Obligation to perform service exclusively one of law and theory since, in view of continuing existence of sufficient number of volunteers, no male in practice obliged to serve in fire brigade. Financial contribution had therefore become the only effective duty – difference of treatment on ground of sex could hardly be justified for its payment. Conclusion : violation (six votes to three). II.   ARTICLE 14 OF THE CONVENTION TAKEN IN CONJUNCTION WITH ARTICLE   1 OF PROTOCOL No.   1 Unnecessary to examine complaint (unanimously). III.   ARTICLE 50 OF THE CONVENTION Fire service levy and costs and expenses incurred before national courts – reimbursed. Conclusion : respondent State to pay the applicant a specified sum (eight votes to one).   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information Notes