CEDHCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;CLIN;ENG — 17 avril 2014
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:002-9991
- Date
- 17 avril 2014
- Publication
- 17 avril 2014
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleRemainder inadmissible;No violation of Article 6+6-3-d - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Equality of arms) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3 - Rights of defence;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses)
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sD4B5322E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA241FE93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-align:justify; page-break-after:avoid; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s8F2B0B1B { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .s65B66A85 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt } .s97EB40D9 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:14pt; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s5F48796F { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s8B6C6D43 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 177 August-September 2014 Schatschaschwili v. Germany (referral) - 9154/10 Judgment 17.4.2014 [Section V] Article 6 Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Inability to examine absent witnesses, whose testimonies carried considerable weight in applicant’s conviction: case referred to the Grand Chamber The applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery in conjunction with aggravated extortion and sentenced to nine and a half years’ imprisonment. As regards one of the offences, the trial court relied in particular on witness statements made by the two victims of the crime to the police at the pre-trial stage. The statements were read out at the trial as the two witnesses had left Germany and refused to testify as they continued to be traumatised by the crime. In a judgment of 17 April 2014 a Chamber of the Court found, by five votes to two, that there had been no violation of the applicant’s rights under Article 6 §   1 read in conjunction with Article 6 §   3 (d) of the Convention. On 8 September 2014 the case was referred to the Grand Chamber at the applicant’s request.   © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court. Click here for the Case-Law Information NotesCitations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
- Date
- 17 avril 2014
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:002-9991
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel