CEDHPRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG
CEDH · PRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG — 13 juillet 2004
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:003-1050907-1087720
- Date
- 13 juillet 2004
- Publication
- 13 juillet 2004
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulAnalyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sAA365B11 { width:433.58pt; display:inline-block } .s1EB3577 { width:426.91pt; display:inline-block } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s33165EBA { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s9F8EB0C0 { width:18.63pt; display:inline-block } .s9E97F54A { width:85.05pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   361   13.7.2004   Press release issued by the Registrar   Case accepted for referral to the Grand Chamber   The Grand Chamber panel of five judges has accepted the following case for referral to the Grand Chamber under Article 43 [1] of the European Convention on Human Rights:   Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria (application nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98). The case concerns the killing of the applicants’ relatives, Kuncho Angelov and Kiril Petkov, by a military policeman who was trying to arrest them. In a judgment of 26 February 2004 (see press release 094), the European Court of Human Rights held that there had been two violations of Article 2 (right to life) of the Convention concerning the shooting of the applicants’ relatives and concerning the lack of an effective investigation into their deaths. The Court further held that there had been violations of Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination), taken together with Article 2, concerning the lack of an investigation into whether discriminatory attitudes played a role in the shootings; and, concerning the shootings themselves. The case was referred to the Grand Chamber at the Government’s request.   ***   Further information about the Court can be found on its Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).   Registry of the European Court of Human Rights F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex Press contacts:   Roderick Liddell (telephone: +00 33 (0)3 88 41 24 92)   Emma Hellyer (telephone: +00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15)   Stéphanie Klein (telephone: +00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Fax: +00 33 (0)3 88 41 27 91   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights. Since 1 November 1998 it has sat as a full-time Court composed of an equal number of judges to that of the States party to the Convention. The Court examines the admissibility and merits of applications submitted to it. It sits in Chambers of 7 judges or, in exceptional cases, as a Grand Chamber of 17 judges. The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe supervises the execution of the Court’s judgments. [1] Under Article 43 of the European Convention on Human Rights, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court. In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general importance, in which case the Grand Chamber will deliver a final judgment. If no such question or issue arises, the panel will reject the request, at which point the judgment becomes final. Otherwise Chamber judgments become final on the expiry of the three-month period or earlier if the parties declare that they do not intend to make a request to refer.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- PRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG
- Date
- 13 juillet 2004
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:003-1050907-1087720
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel