CEDHPRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
CEDH · PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG — 14 juin 2006
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:003-1704122-1786309
- Date
- 14 juin 2006
- Publication
- 14 juin 2006
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulAnalyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s69BE285C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:85.05pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-85.05pt } .s9A223E1B { width:11.03pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s595A57E4 { width:85.05pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s3CED24E9 { width:27.05pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   341 14.6.2006   Press release issued by the Registrar   GRAND CHAMBER HEARING McKAY v. UNITED KINGDOM   The European Court of Human Rights is holding a Grand Chamber hearing today Wednesday 14 June 2006 at 9 a.m., in the case of McKay v. United Kingdom (application no. 543/03).   The applicant   The case concerns an application brought by a British citizen, Mark Mckay who was born in 1983 and lives in Bangor, Northern Ireland.   Summary of the facts   On 6 January 2001, at 10 p.m., he was arrested on suspicion of having carried out a robbery of a petrol station in Bangor, County Down. On 7 January 2001, he admitted being responsible for the robbery and was charged.   On 8 January 2001 the applicant made his first appearance in the magistrates’ court, where he instructed his solicitors to make an application for his release on bail. The police officer gave evidence to the court stating that the robbery was not connected with terrorism and that, subject to the proper conditions, he would have no objection to bail.   The sitting resident magistrate refused the application, indicating that the offence was a scheduled offence and that he therefore did not have the power to order release (under section 67(2) of the Terrorism Act 2000 and section 3(2) of the Northern Ireland (Emergency Provisions) Act 1996).   On 8 January 2001, the applicant applied to the High Court for bail. On 9   January 2001, the High Court heard and granted his application.   On 12 April 2001, the applicant pleaded guilty in the Crown Court to an offence of robbery and was sentenced to two years’ detention in a young offenders’ institution, followed by a year of probation.   The applicant applied unsuccessfully for judicial review seeking a declaration that the legislation in question was incompatible with Articles 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination) of the European Convention on Human Rights.   Complaint   The applicant complains that people charged with scheduled offences cannot apply for bail before the magistrates' court; they are required to make an application to the High Court and it may be up to four days later before their application is heard. He maintains that this is in breach of Article 5 (right to liberty and security) of the European Convention on Human Rights as it separates the power to grant bail from the court before which an accused person is brought and leaves the accused person to seek bail elsewhere.   Procedure   The application was lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 8 January 2003 and declared admissible on 30 November 2004. On 17 January 2006 the Chamber relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber in accordance with Article 30 of the Convention.   Composition of the Court   The case will be heard by the Grand Chamber composed as follows:   Christos Rozakis (Greek), Judge , Jean-Paul Costa (French), Nicolas Bratza (British), Peer Lorenzen (Danish), Françoise Tulkens (Belgian), Josep Casadevall (Andorran), Nina Vajić (Croatian) Matti Pellonpää (Finnish), Rait Maruste (Estonian), Kristaq Traja (Albanian), Snejana Botoucharova (Bulgarian), Javier Borrego Borrego (Spanish), Ljiljana Mijović (citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina), Egbert Myjer (Netherlands), Sverre Erik Jebens (Norwegian), Ján Šikuta (Slovakian), Ineta Ziemele (Latvian), judges , Anatoli Kovler (Russian), Lech Garlicki (Polish), Dragoljub Popović (Serbian), substitute judges , and also Vincent Berger , Acting Registrar .   Representatives of the parties   Government :   John Grainger , Agent ,   David Perry , Paul Maguire, Counsel ,   Ian Wimpress, Caroline Mersey , Advisers ;   Applicant :   John Larkin, Barry Torrens , Counsel ,   Pearse MacDermott, Solicitor .   ***   After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.   Press Contacts   Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Beverley Jacobs (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 54 21)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
- Date
- 14 juin 2006
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:003-1704122-1786309
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel