CEDH · PRESS;GENERAL;ENG — 16 juin 2006

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s13F94BDE { font-family:Arial; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .s83BE5C30 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   352 16.6.2006   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   20 and 22 June 2006   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 17 Chamber judgments on Tuesday 20 June 2006 and 25 on Thursday 22 June 2006.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     Tuesday 20 June 2006   Malquarti v. France (application no. 39269/02) The applicant, Vincent Malquarti, is a French national born in 1951 who lives in Lyon (France).   He relies on Article 6 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights.   Zarb Adami v. Malta (no. 17209/02) The applicant, Maurice Zarb Adami, is a Maltese national living in Attard (Malta).   He complains that, in being frequently required to serve on a jury, he has been the victim of sex discrimination. He relies on Articles 14 (prohibition of discrimination) and 4 (prohibition of slavery and forced labour) of the Convention.   A.S. v. Poland (no. 39510/98) The applicant, A.S., is a Polish national born in 1958 and living in Wrocław (Poland).   He relies in particular on Article 5 (right to liberty and security).   Drabek v. Poland (no. 5270/04) Pasiński v. Poland (no. 6356/04) The applicants, Grzegorz Drabek and Dariusz Pasiński, who are both Polish nationals, were born in 1963 and 1968 and are detained in Poland in Lublin Prison and Koszalin Prison respectively.   In both cases, the applicants rely particularly on Article 5 (right to liberty and security).   Babylonová v. Slovakia (no. 69146/01) The applicant, Katarína Babylonová, is a Slovakian national born in 1951 living in Nové Zámky (Slovakia).   She relies on Article 8 (right to respect for private life and home) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Havva Dudu Esen v. Turkey (no. 45626/99) The applicant, Havva Dudu Esen, is a Turkish national born in 1954 who lives in Bolu (Turkey).   She relies on Article 2 (right to life) concerning the investigation into the death of her father.   Örs and Others v. Turkey (no. 46213/99) The seven applicants, Saime Örs, Sevim Aktaş, Behzat Örs, Hakan Eyi, Nevzat Çiftçi, Kadri Teymur and Hüseyin Arslan are all Turkish nationals.   They rely on Articles 5 § 3 (right to be brought promptly before a judge), 6 §§ 1 and 3 (right to a fair trial) and 8 (right to respect for private and family life).   Tan and Others v. Turkey (no. 42577/98) The five applicants, Mustafa Nail Tan, Hüseyin Kılıçarslan, Salim Ateş, İsmet Şen and Hüseyin Yürekli, are all Turkish nationals, born respectively in 1933, 1944, 1957 and 1941.   They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Vayiç v. Turkey (no. 18078/02) The applicant, İsrafil Vayiç, is a Turkish national born in 1963 who lived in Istanbul at the material time.   He relies on Articles 5 § 3 (right to be brought promptly before a judge) and 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Yaşaroğlu   v. Turkey (n o 45900/99) The applicant, Fatma Yaşaroğlu, is a Turkish national born in 1969 who lives in Istanbul.   She relies on Article 2 (right to life) of the Convention concerning the death of her husband and the effectiveness of the investigation as well as Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Elahi v. United Kingdom (no. 30034/04) The applicant, Ashiq Hussain Elahi, is a British national, born in 1967, who was serving a sentence of imprisonment in Ranby Prison (United Kingdom) when he lodged his application with the Court.   He relies on Articles 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and 8 (right to respect for private life and correspondence).   Repetitive cases   Joye v. France (application no 5949/02) The applicant, Jacques Joye, is a French national born in 1948 who lives in Morainvilliers (France). He relies on Article 6 (right to a fair trial).   Syndicat National des Professionnels des Procédures Collectives v. France (no. 70387/01) The applicant is a union, le Syndicat National des Professionnels des Procédures Collectives. It relies on Article 6 (right to a fair trial).   Mehmet Küçük c. Turquie (n o 75728/01 The applicant, Mehmet Küçük, is a Turkish national born in 1960 who lives in Antakya (Turkey).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) and Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property).   Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases the applicants complain of the excessive length of civil proceedings. They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Obluk v. Slovakia (no. 69484/01) Teréni v. Slovakia (no. 77720/01)     Thursday 22 June 2006   Kazakova v. Bulgaria (no. 55061/00) The applicant, Penka Atanasova Kazakova, is a Bulgarian national who was born in 1960 and lives in Straja (Bulgaria).   She relies on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), 13 (right to an effective remedy), 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security) and 8 (right to respect for private and family life).   Guilloury v. France (no. 62236/00) The applicant, Alain Guilloury, is a French national who was born in 1955 and lives in Plouezec (France).   He relies on Article 6 §§ 1 (right to a fair trial) and 3 (d) (right to obtain attendance and examination of witnesses).   Gorou v. Greece (No. 3) (no. 21845/03) The applicant, Anthi Gorou, is a Greek national who was born in 1957 and lives in Athens.   She relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Mavromatis v. Greece (no. 6225/04) The applicant, Christos Mavromatis, is a Greek national who was born in 1959 and lives in Athens.   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) of the Convention.   Kaftailova v. Latvia (no. 59643/00) The applicant, Natella Kaftailova, of Georgian origin was born in 1958 and lives in Riga (Latvia). She currently has no nationality.   She complains under Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the Convention about the authorities failure to regularise her residence in Latvia.   Metelitsa v. Russia (no. 33132/02) The applicant, Yevgeniy Anatolyevich Metelitsa, is a Russian national who was born in 1968 and is now serving his sentence in Irkutsk (Russia).   He relies on Article 6 §§ 1 (right to a fair trial) and 3(c) (right to legal assistance of own choosing).   Díaz Ochoa v. Spain (no. 423/03) The applicant, Ramon Díaz Ochoa, is a Spanish national who was born in 1956 and lives in Fuenlabrada (Spain).   He relies on Articles 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing), 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Bianchi v. Switzerland (no. 7548/04) The applicant, Stefano Bianchi, is an Italian national who was born in 1962 and lives in Buggiano (Italy).   He complains under Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) about the failure by the Swiss authorities to execute judicial decisions ordering that his son – who had been abducted by his mother – be returned to Italy.   Ayaz and Others v. Turkey (no. 11804/02) The applicants are 13 Turkish nationals.   They rely on Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 (right to liberty and security).   D. and Others v. Turkey (no. 24245/03) The applicants, A.D., his wife P.S. and their daughter P.D., are Iranian nationals who were born in 1969, 1976 and 1997, respectively, and are currently living in Kastamonu (Turkey).   They rely on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and Articles 13 (right to an effective remedy) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination).   Eytişim Ltd. Şti. v. Turkey (no. 69763/01) The applicant, Eytişim Ltd. Şti., is a publishing company in Istanbul.   The company relies in particular on Article 10 (freedom of expression) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Gökçe and Demirel v. Turkey (no. 51839/99) The applicants, Caferi Sadık Gökçe and Rıza Demirel, are Turkish nationals who were born in 1975 and 1969, respectively, and were detained in Gebze Prison (Turkey) at the time of their application to the Court.   They rely on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 5 (right to liberty and security), Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Hüseyin Karakaş v. Turkey (No. 2) (no. 69988/01) Köylüoğlu v. Turkey (no. 45742/99) Uçkan v. Turkey (no. 42594/98) Hüseyin Karakaş is a Turkish national who was born in 1968 and lives in Istanbul. Muhittin Köylüoğlu is a Turkish national who was born in 1961 and lives in Istanbul. Esat Uçkan is a Turkish national who was born in 1959. At the time of the events, he was detained at Bergama Prison (Turkey).   The applicants complain about their treatment in custody, relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment). Mr Karakaş and Mr Köylüoğlu also rely on Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Mr Karakaş and Mr Uçkan further rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Sertkaya v. Turkey (no. 77113/01) The applicant, Abbas Sertkaya, is a Turkish national who was born in 1974 and lives in Muş (Turkey).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Tamer and Others v. Turkey (no. 235/02) The applicants, Fazıl Ahmet Tamer, Erol Kaplan and Hasan Demir, are three Turkish nationals born in 1966 and 1967. They all live in Istanbul.   They all rely on Article 5 (right to liberty and security).   Repetitive cases   Ucci v. Italy (no. 213/04) The applicant, Pellegrino Ucci, is an Italian national who was born in 1945 and lives in Bénévent (Italy). He relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Chebotarev v. Russia (no. 23795/02) The applicant, Anatoliy Tikhonovich Chebotarev, is a Russian national who was born in 1938 and lives in Novovoronezh (Russia).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Kömürcü v. Turkey (no. 77432/01) The applicant, Aytekin Kömürcü, is a Turkish national who was born in1970 and lives in Mardin (Turkey).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Konuk v. Turkey (no. 49523/99) Yılmaz and Barım v. Turkey (no. 47874/99) The applicants, Ali Konuk, Bilgin Yılmaz and Burhan Barım, are Turkish nationals who were born in 1952, 1972 and 1968, respectively. When the application was lodged before the Court, they were detained at Bergama Prison (Turkey).   They all rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases the applicants complain of the excessive length of civil proceedings. The applicant in Kirsanova also relies on Article 13 that the domestic legal system failed to afford her an effective remedy against the excessive length of proceedings.   Kakamoukas and Others v. Greece (no. 38311/02) Avakova v. Russia (no. 30395/04) Kirsanova v. Russia (no. 76964/01)     ***   Press Contacts   Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Beverley Jacobs (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 54 21)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.