CEDH · PRESS;GENERAL;ENG — 23 juin 2006

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   370 23.6.2006   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   27 and 29 June 2006   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 19 Chamber judgments on Tuesday 27 June 2006 and 34 on Thursday 29 June 2006.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     Tuesday 27 June 2006   Mazelie v. France (application no. 5356/04) The applicant, Yves Mazelie, is a French national who was born in 1915 and lives in La Ferte-Milon (France).   He relies on Article 1 of Protocol No.1 (protection of property) to the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the Convention.   Kuvikas v. Lithuania (no. 21837/02) Simonavičius v. Lithuania (no. 37415/02) The applicants, Edvardas Kuvikas and Renatas Simonavičius, are Lithuanian nationals who were born in 1966 and 1973 and live in Šiauliai and Naujoji Akmenė (Lithuania) respectively.   They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Byrzykowski v. Poland (no. 11562/05) The applicant, Wojciech Byrzykowski, is a Polish national who was born in 1974 and lives in Wrocław (Poland).   He relies on Articles 2 (right to life) and 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Dzierżanowski v. Poland (no. 2983/02) The applicant, Bogdan Dzierżanowski, is a Polish national who was born in 1966 and lives in Białystock (Poland).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).       Tabor v. Poland (no. 12825/02) The applicant, Józef Tabor, is a Polish national who was born in 1952 and lives in Cracow (Poland).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Petre v. Romania (no. 71649/01) The applicants, Corneliu Petre and Mircea Bogdan Petre, are Romanian nationals who were born in 1951 and 1975 respectively and live in Bucharest.   They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Bíro v. Slovakia (no. 57678/00) The applicant, Dušan Bíro, is a Slovakian national who was born in 1951 and lives in Bratislava.   He relies on Articles 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) and 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Avci and Others v. Turkey (no. 70417/01) The applicants, Mesut Avci, Ümit Kanlı, Kenan Korkankorkmaz and Berna Saygılı Ünsal, are Turkish nationals who were born in 1967, 1969, 1973 and 1971 respectively.   They complain about being chained unconscious to their hospital beds while on hunger strike, relying on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Çağırıcı v. Turkey (no. 74325/01) The applicant, Ömer Çağırıcı, is a Turkish national who was born in 1976 and lives in Batman (Turkey).   He relies on Articles 5 §§ 3 (right to be brought promptly before a judge) and 4 (right to have lawfulness of detention decided speedily by a court).   Cennet Ayhan and Mehmet Salih Ayhan v. Turkey (no. 41964/98) The applicants, Cennet Ayhan and Mehmet Salih Ayhan, are Turkish nationals who were born in 1962 and 1961 respectively and live in Ankara and Mardin (Turkey).   They complain that State agents were involved in the shooting of their relative and that no effective investigation was undertaken. They rely on Articles 2 (right to life), 13 (right to an effective remedy) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination).   Çetinkaya v. Turkey (no. 75569/01) The applicant, Suat Çetinkaya, is a Turkish national who was born in 1967 and lives in Izmir (Turkey).   He relies on Articles 10 (freedom of expression), 11 (freedom of assembly and association) and 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).     Deniz v. Turkey (no. 71355/01) The applicant Hasan Deniz is a Turkish national who was born in 1974 and lives in Paris.   He relies in particular on Articles 10 (freedom of expression) and 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Yeşilgöz and Firik v. Turkey (no. 58459/00) The applicants, Hasan Deniz, Selman Yeşilgöz and Ali Firik, are Turkish nationals who were born in 1962 and 1970 respectively and live in Istanbul.   They rely on Articles 10 (freedom of expression) and 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Saygılı and Seyman v. Turkey (no. 51041/99) The applicants, Fevzi Saygılı and Tuncay Seyman are both Turkish nationals who were born in 1966 and 1975 respectively and live in Istanbul.   They rely on Articles 10 (freedom of expression), 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination).   Repetitive case   Sassi v. France (no. 19617/02) The applicant, Philippe Sassi, is a French national who was born in 1935 and lives in Cannes (France).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases the applicants complain of the excessive length of administrative proceedings.   Nicolas v. France (no. 2021/03) Bielec v. Poland (no. 40082/02) Gabay v. Turkey (no. 70829/01) Revision     Thursday 29 June 2006   Öllinger v. Austria (no. 76900/01) The applicant, Karl Öllinger, is an Austrian national who was born in 1951 and lives in Vienna.   He complains in particular about the prohibition of an assembly he had intended to hold in commemoration of the Salzburg Jews murdered by the SS during the Second World War. He relies in particular on Article 11 (freedom of assembly and association).   Zeman v. Austria (no. 23960/02) The applicant, Walter Zeman, is an Austrian national who was born in 1939 and lives in Vienna. He complains about the reduction in his pension after his wife’s death, relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination).   Viola v. Italy (no. 8316/02) The applicant, Marcello Viola, is an Italian national who was born in 1959 and lives in Costarelle di Preturo (Italy).   He relies on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), 8 (right to respect for private and family life and correspondence) and 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) concerning the application of a special prison regime in his case under Article 41 of the Prison Administration Act.   Caracas v. Romania (no. 78037/01) The applicants, Eufrosina   Caracas (who died in 2001?), Victoria Cristina Caracas and Dimitrie   Victor   Caracas, all Romanian nationals who live or lived in Bucharest were born in 1915, 1947 and 1943 respectively.   They all rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Jujescu v. Romania (no. 12728/03) Toganel and Gradinaru v. Romania (no. 5691/03) The applicants, Rodica Maria Jujescu, Laurentiu Toganel and Ana Gradinaru, are Romanian nationals living in Bucharest and Targu Mures (Romania).   They all rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Panteleyenko v. Ukraine (no. 11901/02) The applicant, Oleksandr Sergiyovych Panteleyenko, is a Ukrainian national who was born in 1960 and lives in Chernigiv (Ukraine).   He relies on Articles 8 (right to respect for private life), 6 § 2 (presumption of innocence) and 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Repetitive cases   Calicchio and Urriolabeitia v. Italy (no. 17175/02) Chiumiento v. Italy (no. 3649/02) La Frazia v. Italy (no. 3653/02) Vertucci v. Italy (no. 29871/02) The applicants, Antonio Calicchio, Maria Bilbao Urriolabeitia, Michele Chiumiento, Rito Antonio La Frazia and Maria Rosaria Vertucci are all Italian nationals who were born in 1952, 1953, 1971, 1955 and 1972 and live in Bénévent (Italy).   They all rely on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life and correspondence), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property), Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (freedom of movement) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy). In the cases of Chiumiento, La Frazia and Vertucci, they also rely on Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 (right to free elections).   Scorzolini v. Italy (no. 15483/02) The applicant, Cesare Scozolini, is an Italian national who was born in 1933 and lives in Rome.   He relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time.)   Shilov and Baykova v. Russia (no. 703/02) Vasilyeva and Others v. Russia (no. 8011/02) The applicants, all Russian nationals, live in Yaroslavl and Voronezh (Russia).   They all rely on Article   6 §   1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property).   Murashova v. Ukraine (no. 16003/03) Volosyuk v. Ukraine (no. 60712/00) Zhmak v. Ukraine (no. 36852/03) The applicants, all Ukranian nationals, live in Kherson, Khmelnitskiy and Kyiv (Ukraine).   They all rely on Article   6 §   1 (right to a fair hearing). In the cases Murashova and Volosyuk they rely on Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property) and, in Murashova, the applicant relies further on Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).     Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases, the applicants rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Brunnthaler v. Austria (no. 45289/99) Počuča v. Croatia (no. 38550/02) Nold v. Germany (no. 27250/02)   The applicants in the following cases all rely on Articles 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Božić v. Croatia (no. 22457/02) Olshannikova v. Russia (no. 77089/01) Arsenić v. Slovenia (no. 22174/02 and 23666/02) Cokan v. Slovenia (no. 76525/01) Krajnc v. Slovenia (no. 75616/01) Lampret v. Slovenia (no. 42260/02) Mulej v. Slovenia (no. 42252/02) Husejinovič v. Slovenia (no. 41513/02) Plantarič v. Slovenia (no. 54503/00) Prevalnik v. Slovenia (no. 25046/02) Rakanovič v. Slovenia (no. 42306/02) Šilc v. Slovenia (no. 45936/99) Stevančevič v. Slovenia (no. 41514/02) Vukovič v. Slovenia (no. 43365/02)     ***   Press Contacts   Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Beverley Jacobs (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 54 21)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.