CEDH · PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG — 30 juin 2006

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   387 29.6.2006   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   4 and 6 July 2006   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 11 Chamber judgments on Tuesday 4 July 2006 and 17 on Thursday 6 July 2006.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     Tuesday 4 July 2006   Zarb v. Malta (application no. 16631/04) The applicant, Nazzareno Zarb, is a Maltese national who was born in 1971 and is currently detained at Corradino Prison (Malta).   He relies on Articles 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the European Convention on Human Rights.   Dzyruk v. Poland (no. 77832/01) The applicant, Jarosław Dzyruk, is a Polish national who was born in 1963 and is presently detained in Hrubieszów Prison (Poland).   He relies on Article 5 § 3 (right to be brought promptly before a judge) and Article 8 (right to respect for correspondence) of the Convention.     Repetitive cases   Blagovestnyy v. Russia (no. 72558/01) The applicant, Pavel Dmitriyevich Blagovestnyy, is a Russian national who was born in 1950 and lives in Elista (Russia).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Erkan v. Turkey (no. 1291/03) Kamile Uyanık v. Turkey (no. 12087/03) Karaman and Beyazıt v. Turkey (no. 73739/01) Kutlu v. Turkey (no. 65914/01) Yılmaz v. Turkey (no. 12068/03) Uyanık v. Turkey (no. 49514/99) Yayabaşı v. Turkey (no. 12083/03) The applicants, all Turkish nationals, all rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property). The applicants in Karaman and Beyazıt also rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Length-of-proceedings case   In the following case, the applicant complains of the excessive length of civil proceedings. He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Rylski v. Poland (no. 24706/02)     Thursday 6 July 2006   Papa v. Greece (no. 21091/04) The applicant, Andrea Papa, is a Greek national who was born in 1982 and lives in Athens.   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Beka-Koulocheri v. Greece (no. 38878/03) The applicant, Asimina Beka-Koulocheri, is a Greek national who lives in Spata (Greece).   She relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Baybaşın v. Netherlands (no. 13600/02) Salah v. Netherlands (no. 8196/02) Sylla v. Netherlands (no. 14683/03) The applicants are Hüseyin Baybaşın, who is a Turkish national, born in 1956; Khalid Salah, who is an Algerian national, born in 1964 and Béliar Sylla, who is a French national, born in 1966. They are all currently serving prison sentences in the Netherlands.   They all complain about the weekly routine strip-searches to which they were subjected and rely on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment). The applicants in Baybaşın and Salah also rely on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life and correspondence).   Telecki v. Poland (no. 56552/00) The applicant, Grzegorz Telecki, is a Polish national who was born in 1959 and lives in Lublin (Poland).   He relies on Article 5 § 3 (right to be brought promptly before a judge).   Roşca v. Romania (no. 75129/01) The applicant, Sorinel-Cristian Roşca, is a Romanian national who was born in 1970 and lives in Bucarest.   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life).   Zhigalev v. Russia (no. 54891/00) The applicant, Vladimir Alekseyevich Zhigalev, is a Russian national who was born in 1949 and lives in Nemcha (Russia).   He relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Erbakan v. Turkey (no. 59405/00) The applicant, Necmettin Erbakan, is a Turkish national who was born in1926 and lives in Ankara.   He relies on Article 10 (freedom of expression) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Kavak v. Turkey (no. 53489/99) The applicants, Cayze Kavak and Gıyas Kavak, are Turkish nationals who were born in 1931 and 1932, respectively, and live in Diyarbakır (Turkey).   The applicants allege that their son, Cemal Kavak, found dead in April 1996, was the victim of an extra-judicial execution. They also complain about the lack of an effective investigation into his death. They rely particularly on Article 2 (right to life), Article 13 (right to an effective remedy), Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Keklik v. Turkey (no. 60574/00) The applicant, Dilaver Keklik, is a Turkish national who was born in 1959. At the time the application was lodged with the Court, he was detained at Aydın Prison (Turkey).   He complains in particular about the treatment inflicted on him while in police custody, relying on Article 3 (prohibition of torture) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Repetitive cases   Campello v. Italy (no. 21757/02) Ciaramella v. Italy (no. 6597/03) The applicants, Giancarlo Campello and Pietro Ciaramella, are Italian nationals who were born in 1955 and 1942 respectively. Mr Campello lives in Bolzano (Italy) and Mr Ciaramella lives in Bénévent (Italy).   They rely on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life and correspondence), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property), Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (freedom of movement) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy). In the case of Campello , the applicant also relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Grossi and others v. Italy (no. 18791/03) The applicants are nine Italian nationals.   They rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).     Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases the applicants complain of the excessive length of civil or administrative proceedings. They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time). In Sehur v. Slovenia the applicants also rely on Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) concerning the length of the proceedings to which they were parties.   Andoniadis v. Greece (no. 10803/04) Sehur v. Slovenia (no. 42246/02) Rizova v. “the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (no. 41228/02)   ***   Press Contacts   Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Beverley Jacobs (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 54 21)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.