CEDH · PRESS;GENERAL;ENG — 7 juillet 2006

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   414 7.7.2006   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   11 and 13 July 2006   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 12 Chamber judgments on Tuesday 11 July 2006 and 51 on Thursday 13 July 2006.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     Tuesday 11 July 2006   Harkmann v. Estonia (application no. 2192/03) The applicant, Allar Harkmann, was born in 1955 and lives in Tartu (Estonia).   He relies in particular on Article 5 (right to liberty and security) of the European Convention on Human Rights.   Rivière v. France (no. 33834/03) The applicant, Jean-Luc Rivière, is a French national who was born in 1956. He is currently detained at Riom Prison (France). He complains of his continued detention on account of his psychiatric problems.   He relies on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment).   Campisi v. Italy (no. 24358/02) The applicant, Giuseppe Campisi, is an Italian national who was born in 1960. He is currently detained at Sulmona Prison (Italy).   He relies on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 8 (right to respect for correspondence), Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Boicenco v. Moldova (no. 41088/05) The applicant, Nicolae Boicenco, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1961 and lives in Chişinău. He complains in particular about being ill-treated by the police.   He relies on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), 5 (right to liberty and security) and 34 (right of individual petition).   Gurov v. Moldova (no. 36455/02) The applicant, Maria Gurov, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1956 and lives in Chişinău.   She relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Aliuţǎ v. Romania (no. 73502/01) The applicant, Gheorghe Aliuţǎ, is a Romanian national who was born in 1959 and lives in Bucharest.   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Teslim Töre v. Turkey (No. 2) (no. 13244/02) The applicant, Teslim Töre, is a Turkish national who was born in 1939. He is currently at large.   He relies on Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Saadi v. United Kingdom (no. 13229/03) The applicant, Shayan Baram Saadi, is an Iraqi national who was born in 1976 and lives in London. He fled Iraq and arrived at London Heathrow Airport in December 2000. He complains about his detention at the Oakington Reception Centre.   He relies on Articles 5 (right to liberty and security) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination) of the Convention.     Repetitive cases   Sarl du Parc d’Activités de Blotzheim v. France (no. 72377/01) The applicant, Sarl du Parc d’Activités de Blotzheim, is a French limited company based in Blotzheim (France).   The company relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Bastone v. Italy (no. 59638/00) The applicant, Giovanni Bastone, is an Italian national who was born in 1943. He is currently detained in Sulmona Prison (Italy).   He relies on Article 8 (right to respect for correspondence).   La Rosa and Alba v. Italy (No. 5) (no. 63239/00) The applicants are four Italian nationals.   They rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Maselli v. Italy (No. 2) (no. 61211/00) The applicant, Guiseppe Maselli, is an Italian national who was born in 1942 and lives in Castelpagano (Italy).   He relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).     Thursday 13 July 2006   Agga v. Greece (No. 3) (no. 32186/02) Agga v. Greece (No. 4) (no. 33331/02) The applicant, Mehmet Agga, is a Greek national who was born in 1932 and lives in Xanthi (Greece). He was chosen to be the Mufti of Xanthi by the Muslims who attended prayers at the mosques in that area; the Greek State appointed another Mufti but the applicant refused to step down.   He relies on Articles 9 (freedom of thought, conscience and religion) and 10 (freedom of expression).   Allushi v. Greece (no. 3525/04) The applicant, Aleks Allushi, is an Albanian national who was born in 1964. He is currently serving a prison sentence in Patras Prison (Greece).   He relies in particular on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Housing Association of War Disabled and Victims of War of Attica and Others v. Greece (no. 35859/02) The applicant, the Housing Association of War Disabled and Victims of War of Attica, is a Greek association.   The association relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Zacharakis v. Greece (no. 17305/02) The applicant, Emmanuel Zacharakis, is a Greek national who was born in 1936.   He relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Lafargue v. Romania (no. 37284/02) The applicant, Gaston Lafargue, is a French national who was born in 1964 and lives in Saint-Vincent-de-Paul (France).   He relies on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life).   SC Magna Holding SRL v. Romania (no. 10055/03) The applicant, SC Magna Holding SRL, is a company based in Ploieşti (Romania) .   The company relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Dubinskaya v. Russia (no. 4856/03) The applicant, Galina Ruvimovna Dubinskaya, is an Israeli and Russian national who was born in 1941 and lives in Tel-Aviv.   She relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Popov v. Russia (no. 26853/04) The applicant, Mikhail Yevgenyevich Popov, is a Russian national who was born in 1978 and is currently serving his sentence in the YaCh-91/5 Prison in Sarapul (Russia). He complains in particular about the conditions of his detention.   He relies in particular on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), 6 (right to a fair trial), 34 (right of individual petition) and 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Fuscher v. Switzerland (no. 55894/00) The applicant, Andreas Fuchser, is a Swiss national who was born in 1964 and lives in Meiringen (Switzerland).   He relies on Article 5 § 4 (right to liberty and security).   Jäggi v. Switzerland (no. 58757/00) The applicant, Andreas Jäggi, is a Swiss national who was born in 1939 and lives in Geneva (Switzerland). He complains that he was unable to have a DNA analysis carried out on a deceased person in order to ascertain whether the person was his biological father.   He relies on Articles 8 (right to respect for private and family life), 13 (right to an effective remedy) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination).   Ressegatti v. Switzerland (no. 17671/02) The applicants, Angelo Goffredo Ressegatti and his sons Angelo Josef Ressegatti, Bruno Hans Ressegatti and Reto Franziskus Ressegatti, are Swiss nationals who were born in 1924, 1955, 1957 and 1959 and live in Bäch, Zurich, Wil and Gravesano respectively.   They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Doğan and Others v. Turkey (nos. 8803-8811, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02) Just satisfaction The applicants are 15 Turkish nationals.   In a judgment delivered on 29 June 2004 the Court held that there had been a violation of Articles 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property). It reserved the question of the application of Article 41 (just satisfaction).   İmrek v. Turkey (no. 57175/00) The applicant, Ender İmrek, is a Turkish national who was born in 1961 and lives in Malatya (Turkey).   He relies on Article 10 (freedom of expression) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Okatan v. Turkey (no. 40996/98) The applicant, Mehmet Okatan, is a Turkish national who was born in 1976. At the time of the events he was being held in Bandırma Prison (Turkey).   He relies on Articles 5 (right to liberty and security) and 6 (right to a fair trial).   S.S. and M.Y. v. Turkey (no. 37951/97) The applicants are Turkish nationals who were born in 1941 and 1952 and live in Diyarbakır (Turkey).   They rely on Articles 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Repetitive cases   Farange S.A. v. France (no. 77575/01) The applicant, Farange S.A., is a French company based in Ajaccio (France).   The company relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Lo Bue and Others v. Italy (no. 12912/04) Zaffuto and Others v. Italy (no. 12894/04) The applicants are seven Italian nationals.   They rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Vincenzo Taiani v. Italy (no. 3638/02) The applicant, Vincenzo Taiani, is an Italian national who was born in 1935 and lives in Benevento (Italy).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to fair hearing within a reasonable time), Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life and for correspondence), Article 13 (right to an effective remedy), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property), Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (freedom of movement) and Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 (right to free elections).   Grigoryeva v. Russia (no. 21419/04) Kovalenko v. Russia (no. 21410/04) Matrena Polupanova v Russia (no. 21447/04) Shamina v. Russia (no. 70501/01) Shiryayeva v. Russia (no. 21417/04) Terekhova v. Russia (no. 21425/04) Vasilyeva v. Russia (no. 21430/04) The applicants are all Russian nationals.   They all rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Vasylyev v. Ukraine (no. 10232/02) The applicant, Anatoliy Fedorovych Vasylyev, is a Ukrainian national who lives in Vinnytsa (Ukraine).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing), Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).     Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases the applicants complain in particular of the excessive length of civil or administrative proceedings, relying on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Stork v. Germany (no. 38033/02) Kortessi v. Greece (no. 31259/04) Lazaridi v. Greece (no. 31282/04) Nikas and Nika v. Greece (no. 31273/04) Nichifor v. Romania (No. 1) (no. 62276/00) Silin v. Ukraine (no. 23926/02)   The applicants in the following cases all rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Galatalis v. Greece (no. 36251/03) Beriša v. Slovenia (no. 1459/01) Blagojevič v. Slovenia (no. 77809/01) Boškič v. Slovenia (no. 5158/02) Falnoga v. Slovenia (no. 5110/02) Grenko v. Slovenia (no. 29891/02 Guzej v. Slovenia (no. 14619/02) Kristan v. Slovenia (no. 77778/01) Kuzmin v. Slovenia (no. 8756/02) Lušničkič v. Slovenia (no. 5186/02) Obrovnik v. Slovenia (no. 76438/01) Podjaveršek v. Slovenia (no. 5176/02) Radojčič v. Slovenia (no. 4562/02) Radakovič v. Slovenia (no. 20290/02) Svetlin v. Slovenia (no. 10299/02) Zupanc v. Slovenia (no. 1411/02) Bahçeyaka v. Turkey (no. 74463/01)     ***   Press Contacts   Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Beverley Jacobs (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 54 21)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.