CEDH · PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG — 18 juin 2009

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   81 02.02.2007   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   6 and 8 February 2007   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 11 Chamber judgments on Tuesday 6 February 2007 and nine on Thursday 8 February 2007.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     Tuesday 6 February 2007   Garycki v. Poland (application no. 14348/02) The applicant, Grzegorz Garycki, is a Polish national who was born in 1976 and lives in Sosnowiec (Poland).   Relying on Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) of the European Convention on Human Rights, the applicant alleges that the length of his pre-trial detention, on suspicion of having committed a number of burglaries, was excessive. He also relies on Article 6 § 2 (presumption of innocence) of the Convention and Article 8 (right to respect for correspondence).   Najdecki v. Poland (no. 62323/00) The applicant, Zygmunt Najdecki, is a Polish national who was born in 1950 and lives in Miłkowice (Poland).   Relying on Article 5 § 3, the applicant complains about the excessive length of his pre-trial detention on suspicion of having committed fraud and forgery whilst being the member of an organised criminal gang. He also complains that his correspondence with his counsel had been censored in breach of Article 8.   Kwiatek v. Poland (no. 20204/02) The applicant, Dariusz Kwiatek, is a Polish national who was born in 1970 and lives in Dąbrowa Górnicza (Poland).   Relying on Article 5 § 3, the applicant complains about the excessive length of his pre-trial detention on suspicion of committing two burglaries.   Menteş v. Turkey (no. 36487/02) The applicant, Güler Menteş, is a Turkish national who was born in 1972 and lives in Diyarbakır (Turkey).   She relies on Article 6 (right to a fair hearing).   Sümer v. Turkey (no. 27158/02) The applicant, Cemal Sümer, is a Turkish national who was born in 1962 and lives in Izmir (Turkey).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Repetitive cases   Avramenko v. Moldova (no. 29808/02) The applicant, Valeriu Avramenko, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1947 and lives in Bălţi (Moldova).   The applicant complains about the late enforcement of a judgment of 26 June 2002 which ordered compensation for shares the applicant had bought in a state-owned transport company, the purchase having been annulled by the Bălţi District Court. He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Corcoran and Others v. United Kingdom (nos. 60525/00, 63464/00 and 63469/00) Davis and Others v. United Kingdom (nos. 60946/00, 60978/00, 61933/00 and 61408/00) Hart and Others v. United Kingdom (nos. 61019/00, 61394/00, 61398/00, 63471/00 and 63481/00) The 12 applicants are all United Kingdom nationals.   Relying on Articles 8 (right to respect for respect for private and family life) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the applicants complain that, because they were men, they were denied social security benefits equivalent to those received by widows.   Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases the applicants complain of the excessive length of (non-criminal) proceedings.   Wassdahl v. Sweden (no. 36619/03) Kadriye Sülün v. Turkey (no. 33158/03)     Thursday 8 February 2007   Kollcaku v. Italy (no. 25701/03) The applicant, Dashamir Kollcaku, is an Albanian national who was born in 1942 and lives in Selvazzano (Italy).   He relies on Articles 6 (right to a fair hearing) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination).   Čistiakov v. Latvia (no. 67275/01) The applicant, Jurij Čistiakov, is a Lithuanian national who was born in 1969 and lives in Vilnius (Lithuania). In 1996 he was charged with aggravated armed robbery and remanded in custody.   He relies on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), 5 (right to liberty and security), 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and 8 (right to respect for private and family life).   Švarc and Kavnik v. Slovenia (no. 75617/01) The applicants are both Slovenian nationals. Anita Švarc was born in 1968 and lives in Vuzenica (Slovenia), and Ivan Kavnik was born in 1956 and lives in Topolščica (Slovenia).   The case concerns the applicants’ complaint about the fairness and length of civil proceedings against an insurance company following an accident they had had in Austria in which they were injured and which resulted in the premature birth of their son who later died. They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).     Repetitive cases   Cleja and Mihalcea v. Romania (no. 77217/01) Enciu and Lega v. Romania (no. 9292/05) Stroia v. Romania (no. 26449/04) The applicants are Romanian nationals.   They rely on, among other provisions, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property). In the case of Enciu and Lega v. Romania the applicants also rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Aleksandr Ivanov v. Russia (no. 3436/05) Nikishin v. Russia (no. 20515/04) Sergey Tarasov v. Russia (no. 20518/04) The three applicants are Russian nationals and are all retired military officers.   Relying on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property), the applicants complained about the late enforcement of judgments following their action against the Military Department of the Orenburg Region for an increase in pension and compensation for pecuniary damage.   ***   Press contacts Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Beverley Jacobs (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 54 21)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.