CEDH · PRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG — 16 mai 2007

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s33165EBA { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s2C557472 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic; font-variant:small-caps } .sC800182F { font-family:Arial; color:#0000ff } .s4B8D41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .s2C7B3542 { font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; color:#0000ff } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   317 16.05.2007   Press release issued by the Registrar   Court rejects requests for cases to be referred to Grand Chamber   Judgments in the following European Court of Human Rights cases are now final, after requests for them to be referred to the Court’s Grand Chamber were rejected. The Grand Chamber panel of five judges rejected the referral requests under Article 43 [1] of the European Convention on Human Rights.   The text of the Chamber judgment and corresponding press release in each case are available on the Court’s Internet site: www.echr.coe.int.   Beshiri and Others v. Albania (7352/03) judgment of 22 August 2006   Coorplan-Jenni GmbH and Hascic v. Austria (10523/02) judgment of 27 July 2006 Jurisic and Collegium Mehrerau v. Austria (62539/00) judgment of 27 July 2006 Krone Verlags GMBH & Co kg   v. Austria (no. 4) (72331/01) judgment of 9 November 2006   Pandy v. Belgium (13583/02)   judgment of 21 September 2006     Karov v. Bulgaria (45964/99) judgment of 16 November 2006   Božić v. Croatia (22457/02) judgment of 29 June 2006 Vajagić v. Croatia (30431/03) judgment of 20 July 2006   Fiala v. Czech Republic (26141/03) judgment of 18 July 2006 Kořineck and Others v. Czech Republic (77530/01) judgment of 11 April 2006 Pedović v. Czech Republic (27145/03) judgment of 18 July 2006 Šimonová v. Czech Republic (73516/01) judgment of 18 July 2006   Wallová and Walla v. Czech Republic (23848/04) judgment of 26 October 2006   Molander v. Finland (10615/03) judgment of 7 November 2006       Hostein v. France (76450/01) judgment of 18 July 2006 Le Calvez v. France ( no. 2) (18836/02) judgment of 19 December 2006     L.L. v. France (7508/02) judgment of 10 October 2006 Maupas and Others v. France (13844/02) judgment of 19 September 2006   Miraux v. France (73529/01) judgment of 26 September 2006 Nedzela v. France (73695/01) judgment of 27 July 2006 Nicolas v. France (2021/03) judgment of 27 June 2006 Pessino v. France (40403/02) judgment of 10 October 2006 Vincent v. France (6253/03) judgment of 24 October 2006   Grässer v. Germany (66491/01) judgment of 5 October 2006 Nold v. Germany (27250/02) judgment of 29 June 2006   Adelfoi I.O. Verri A.E. Choirotrofiki Epicheirisi v. Greece (2544/04) judgment of 27 July 2006   Efstathiou and Others v. Greece (36998/02) judgment of 27 July 2006   Housing Association of War Disabled and Victims of War of Attica and Others v. Greece (35859/02) judgment of 13 July 2006 Kortessi v. Greece (31259/04) judgment of 13 July 2006 Lazaridi v. Greece (31282/04) judgment of 13 July 2006   Nikas and Nika v. Greece (31273/04) judgment of 13 July 2006 Tsalkitzis v. Greece (11801/04) judgment of 16 November 2006 Zaharakis v. Greece (17305/02) judgment of 13 July 2006   Ajzert v. Hungary (18328/03) judgment of 7 November 2006     Bencze v. Hungary (4578/03) judgment of 31 October 2006 Börcsök Bodor v. Hungary (14962/03) judgment of 3 October 2006     Emesz v. Hungary (36343/03) judgment of 31 October 2006     Földes and Földesné Hajlik v. Hungary (41463/02)   judgment of 31 October 2006     Gergely v. Hungary (23364/03) judgment of 31 October 2006       Ciaramella v. Italy (6597/03) judgment of 6 July 2006   De Blasi v. Italy (1595/02)   judgment of 5 October 2006 Ippoliti v. Italy (12263/05) judgment of 26 October 2006 Francesca Carmine v. Italy (3643/02); Francesca Cosimo v. Italy (3647/02); Marrone v. Italy (3656/02); Minicozzi v. Italy (7774/02); Moretti Francesco v. Italy (10399/02); Pernici v. Italy (20662/02); Pantuso v. Italy (21120/02); Bova v. Italy (25513/02) judgments of 24 May 2006 Gasser v. Italy (10481/02) judgment of 21 September 2006 Giacomelli v. Italy (59909/00) judgment of 2 November 2006 La Frazia v. Italy (3653/02); Chiumento v. Italy (3649/02) ; Calicchio & Uriolabeitia v. Italy (17175/02) ; Vertucci v. Italy (29871/02) judgments of   29 June 2006 Majadallah v. Italy (62094/00) judgment of 19 October 2006 Martellacci v. Italy (33447/02) judgment of 28 September 2006     Roda and Bonfatti v. Italy (10427/02) judgment of 21 November 2006   Von Hoffen v. Liechtenstein (5010/04) judgment of 27 July 2006   Vaivada v.   Lithuania (66004/01 et 36996/02) judgment of 16 November 2006       Andrzejewski v. Poland (72999/01) judgment of 17 October 2006 Atut Sp. Z.o.o. v. Poland (71151/01) judgment of 24 October 2006   Bialas v. Poland (69129/01) judgment of 10 October 2006 Jeruzal v. Poland (65888/01) judgment of 10 October 2006 Jończyk v. Poland (75870/01) judgment of 10 October 2006 Ł ukjaniuk v. Poland (15072/02) judgment of 7 November 2006 Nowak and Zajaczkowski v. Poland (12174/02) judgment of 22 August 2006   Rylski v. Poland (24706/02) judgment of 4 July 2006 Sekulowicz v. Poland (64249/01) judgment of 7 November 2006   Skibińscy v. Poland (52589/99) judgment of 14 November 2006   Gregório de Andrade v. Portugal (41537/02) judgment of 14 November 2006   Acatrinei v. Romania (7114/02) judgment of 26 October 2006 Caracas v. Romania (78037/01) judgment of 29 June 2006 Dima v. Romania (58472/00) judgment of 16 November 2006 Gută v. Romania (35229/02) judgment of 16 November 2006   Iosub Caras v. Romania (7198/04) judgment of 27 June 2006 Mihăescu v. Romania (5060/02) judgment of 2 November 2006     Bazorkina v. Russia (69481/01) judgment of 27 July 2006   Belyatskaya v. Russia (40250/02) judgment of 27 July 2006   Borshchevskiy v. Russia (14853/03) judgment of 21 September 2006 Ledyayeva and Others v. Russia (53157/99, 53247/99, 53695/00 and 56850/00) judgment of 26 October 2006 Mokrushina v. Russia (23377/02) judgment of 5 October 2006     Nelyubin v. Russia (14502/04) judgment of 2 November 2006 Popov v. Russia (26853/04) judgment of 13 July 2006 Shapovalova v. Russia (2047/03) judgment of 5 October 2006 Shelomkov v. Russia (36219/02) judgment of 5 October 2006 Tarasov v. Russia (13910/04) judgment of 28 September 2006 Volovich v. Russia (10374/02) judgment of 5 October 2006 Zaytsev v. Russia (22644/02) judgment of 16 November 2006 Zhigalev v. Russia (54891/00) judgment of 6 July 2006     Olenik v. Slovenia (4225/02) judgment of 2 November 2006 Plantarič   v. Slovenia (54503/00) judgment of 29 June 2006 Š tavbe v. Slovenia (20526/02) judgment of 30 November 2006 Zorc v.   Slovenia (2792/02) judgment of 2 November 2006     Lacarcel Menendez v. Spain (41745/02) judgment of 15 June 2006   Olaechea Cahuas v. Spain (24668/03) judgment of 10 August 2006   Markoski v. «   the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia   » (22928/03) judgment of 2 November 2006   Börekçiogullari (Çökmez) and Others v. Turkey (58650/00) judgment of 19 November 2006 Cennet Ayhan and Mehmet Salih Ayhan v. Turkey (41964/98) judgment of 27 June 2006 İhsan and Satun Önel v. Turkey (9292/02) judgment of 21 September 2006 Kadriye Yildiz and Others v. Turkey (73016/01) judgment of 10 October 2006 Karahanoğlu v. Turkey (74341/01) judgment of 3 October 2006 Mehmet Ali Gündüz v. Turkey (27633/02) judgment of 10 August 2006 Mutlu v. Turkey (8006/02) judgment of 10 October 2006 Okkali v. Turkey (52067/99) judgment of 17 October 2006 Öktem v. Turkey (74306/01) judgment of 19 October 2006     Tamer and Others v. Turkey (235/02) judgment of 22 June 2006 Taner Kiliç v. Turkey (70845/01) judgment of 24 October 2006 Tunceli Kültür ve Dayanişma Derneği v. Turkey (61353/00) judgment of 10 October 2006 Yüksektepe v. Turkey (62227/00) judgment of 24 October 2006     Ananyev v. Ukraine (32374/02) judgment of 30 November 2006   Dvoynykh v. Ukraine (72277/01) judgment of 12 October 2006     Efimenko v. Ukraine (55870/00) judgment of 18 July 2006 Koval v. Ukraine (65550/01) judgment of 19 October 2006   Panteleyenko v. Ukraine (11901/02)   judgment of 29 June 2006 Slukvina v. Ukraine (9023/03) judgment of 21 December 2006 Sokurenko and Strygun v. Ukraine (29458/04 and 29465/04) judgment of 20 July 2006 V. S. v. Ukraine (13400/02) judgment of 30 November 2006       Hobbs, Richard, Walsh and Geen v. United Kingdom (63475/00, 63484/00 and 63468/00) judgment of 14 November 2006 Pearson v. United Kingdom (8374/03) judgment of 22 August 2006 Walker v. United Kingdom (37212/02) judgment of 22 August 2006           ***     Press contacts Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Beverley Jacobs (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 54 21) Tracey Turner-Tretz (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   [1] Under Article 43 of the European Convention on Human Rights, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court. In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general importance, in which case the Grand Chamber will deliver a final judgment. If no such question or issue arises, the panel will reject the request, at which point the judgment becomes final. Otherwise Chamber judgments become final on the expiry of the three-month period or earlier if the parties declare that they do not intend to make a request to refer.