CEDH · PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG — 10 mai 2007

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   286 4.5.2007   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   10 May 2007   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 32 Chamber judgments on Thursday 10 May 2007.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).   Emmer-Reissig v. Austria (application no. 11032/04) Hofbauer v. Austria (no. 2) (no. 7401/04) Both applicants are Austrian nationals. Herwig C. Emmer-Reissig was born in 1921 and lives in Klosterneuburg and Alois Hofbauer was born in 1935 and lives in Gföhl.   They rely, in particular, on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human Rights.   Kushoglu v. Bulgaria (no. 48191/99) The applicants, Ayten Kushoglu and Mehmet Kushoglu, have both Bulgarian and Turkish nationality. They were born in 1958 and 1956, respectively, and live in Malkara (Turkey).   They rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) to the Convention and Article   6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Sirmanov v. Bulgaria (no. 67353/01) The applicant, Nikolay Tsonev Sirmanov, is a Bulgarian national who was born in 1968 and lives in Gabrovo (Bulgaria).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.   Stefan Iliev v. Bulgaria (no. 53121/99) The applicant, Stefan Milanov Iliev, is a Bulgarian national who was born in 1924 and lives in Sofia.   Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), he complains that he was beaten by the police on being arrested and detained in December 1996.   A.H. v. Finland (no. 46602/99) The applicant is a Finnish national who was born in 1960.   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and § 3 (d) (right to obtain attendance and examination of witnesses).   Seris v. France (nos. 38208/03 and 2810/05) The applicant, Bruno Seris, is a French national who was born in 1965 and lives in Mitry-Mory (France).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Tedesco v. France (no. 11950/02) The applicant, Jean-Olivier Tedesco, is a French national who was born in 1959 and lives in Brussels.   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Skugor v. Germany (no. 76680/01) The applicant, Alexander Skugor, is a German national who was born in 1964 and lives in Berlin.   He relies on Articles 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Anastasiadis v. Greece (no. 39725/03) The applicants, Ilias Anastasiadis, Agelos Anastasiadis and Vasilios Anastasiadis, are Greek nationals.   They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   John v. Greece (no. 199/05) The applicant, Denis John, is a Nigerian national who was born in 1983 and lives in Lagos (Nigeria).   He relies on Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security).   Pantaleon v. Greece (no. 6571/05) The applicant, Evangelos Pantaleon, is a Greek national who was born in 1927 and lives in Athens.   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Modârcă v. Moldova (no. 14437/05) The applicant, Vladimir Modârcă, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1949 and lives in Chişinău. He worked as the Head of the Architecture and Planning Department of the Municipal council of Chişinău.   In September 2004 Mr Modârcă was arrested and detained pending trial on suspicion of abuse of power concerning privatisation of a plot of land.   Relying on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and Article 5 (right to liberty and security), the applicant alleged, in particular, that: he had been held in inhuman and degrading conditions and deprived of medical assistance; he had been unlawfully detained and the courts had not given relevant and sufficient reasons for his detention; he had had no access to the relevant parts of his criminal file in order to challenge effectively his detention pending trial and he had been prevented from holding confidential meetings with his lawyer.   Kania v. Poland (no. 59444/00) The applicant, Dariusz Kania, is a Polish national who was born in 1962 and lives in Wrocław (Poland).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right of access to a court).   Akhmadova and Sadulayeva v. Russia (no. 40464/02) The applicants, Tamusa Khamidovna Akhmadova and Larisa Abdulbekovna Sadulayeva, are Russian nationals who were born in 1957 and 1975, respectively. They are residents of Argun (Chechnya) and, at present, live in Ingushetia (Republic of the Russian Federation).   They allege that their son and husband, Shamil Said-Khasanovich Akhmadov, disappeared after being detained by Russian servicemen in Chechnya in March 2001.   They rely on Articles 2 (right to life), 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), 5 (right to liberty and security), 6 (right to a fair hearing) and 13 (right to an effective remedy). Mrs Sadulayeva also complains under Article 34 (right of individual petition) that she was subjected to harassment in reprisal for her application to the Court.   Benediktov v. Russia (no. 106/02) The applicant, Vladimir Aleksandrovich Benediktov, is a Russian national who was born in 1973 and lived until his arrest in Moscow.   In December 1999, Mr Benediktov was arrested on suspicion of robbery. He was subsequently convicted and is currently serving nine years’ imprisonment in a high-security correctional colony in the Mordoviya Republic of the Russian Federation .   He relies, in particular, on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), 13 (right to an effective remedy) and 5 (right to liberty and security).   Kovalev v. Russia (no. 78145/01) The applicant, Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich Kovalev, is a Russian national who was born in 1973 and lives in Aksay (Russia).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Adil Özdemir v. Turkey (no. 36531/02) Mehmet Ali Miçooğulları v. Turkey (no. 75606/01) Taci and Eroğlu v. Turkey (no. 18367/04) In these three cases the applicants rely on Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property). In Adil Özdemir v. Turkey and Mehmet Ali Miçooğulları v. Turkey they also rely on Article   6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Atıcı v. Turkey (no. 19735/02) The applicant, Müseyin Atıcı, is a Turkish national who was born in 1970 and lives in Istanbul.   In 1992 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of being a member of an illegal organisation.   He relies on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment), 5 § 3 (right to be brought promptly before a judge), 13 (right to an effective remedy) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination).   Kamil Uzun v. Turkey (no. 37410/97) The applicant, Kamil Uzun, is a Turkish national who was born in 1964 and lives in Frankfurt (Germany).   Relying in particular on Article 2 (right to life), the applicant complains that the military authorities were responsible for mortar fire that killed his mother.   Üstün v. Turkey (no. 37685/02) The applicant, Saim Üstün, is a Turkish national who was born in 1963 and lives in Istanbul. At the relevant time, Mr Üstün was the owner of a small independent publication firm. In 1992 this firm published a book about the life and political views of the left-wing revolutionary cinema artist Yılmaz Güney.   The case concerns the criminal proceedings brought against Mr Üstün in October 2000 for disseminating separatist propaganda resulting in his conviction and sentencing to six months’ imprisonment, later commuted to a fine. He was subsequently acquitted and the conviction nullified.   He relies on Article 10 (freedom of expression), Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Vurankaya v. Turkey (no. 9613/03) The applicant, Oktay Vurankaya, is a Turkish national who was born in 1969 and lives in Adana (Turkey).   He relies on Articles 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and 13 (right to an effective remedy).   C. v. the United Kingdom (no. 14858/03) The applicant is a British national who was born in 1957 and lives in Plymouth (United Kingdom).   He relies on Articles 6 (right to a fair hearing), 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Repetitive cases   Mazepa v. Moldova (no. 1115/02) The applicant, Nina Mazepa, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1953 and lives in Chişinău.   She relies, in particular, on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Glushakova v. Russia (No. 2) (no. 23287/05) The applicant, Valentina Viktorovna Glushakova, is a Russian national who was born in 1927 and lives in Shakhty (Russia).   She relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Sergey Petrov v. Russia (no. 1861/05) The applicant, Sergey Mikhaylovich Petrov, is a Russian national who was born in 1955 and lives in Moscow.   He relies, in particular, on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Taşatan v. Turkey (no. 60580/00) The applicant, Cevdet Taşatan, is a Turkish national who was born in 1945 and lives in Istanbul.   He relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Runkee and White v. United Kingdom (nos. 42949/98 and 53134/99) Both applicants are British nationals who live in the United Kingdom. George Runkee was born in 1938 and lives in Hull and Brian White was born in 1942 and lives in Warrington.   They rely on Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) in conjunction with Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases, the applicants, relying on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time), complain in particular about the excessive length of (non-criminal) proceedings.   Gospodinov v. Bulgaria (no. 62722/00) Wende and Kukówka v. Poland (no. 56026/00)   ***   Press contacts Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Beverley Jacobs (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 54 21) Tracey Turner-Tretz (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.