CEDH · PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG — 6 juillet 2007

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sE7BEE5ED { width:310.5pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   490 6.7.2007   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   10 and 12 July 2007   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing eight Chamber judgments on Tuesday 10 July 2007 and 26 on Thursday 12 July 2007.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     Tuesday 10 July 2007   Schneider v. Luxemburg (application no. 2113/04) The applicant, Catherine Schneider, is a Luxembourg national who was born in 1974 and lives in Luxembourg.   She relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) taken together with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 11 (freedom of assembly and association) of the European Convention on Human Rights.   Bimer S.A. v. Moldova (no. 15084/03) The applicant, Bimer S.A., is a company incorporated in the Republic of Moldova.   It relies on Article 1 of Protocol n° 1 (protection of property) to the Convention.   Paladi v. Moldova (no. 39806/05) The applicant, Ion Paladi, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1949 and lives in Chişinău. He was Head of the Architecture and Planning Department of the Municipal Council of Chişinău. He has a second-degree disability.   On 24 September 2004 Mr Paladi was remanded on custody in the Centre for Fighting Economic Crime and Corruption on suspicion of abuse of position and power. The case concerns the applicant’s complaint that during his detention, which was allegedly unlawful, he was not given appropriate medical assistance, he was not transferred to a neurological institution despite the recommendations of a doctor and his neurological treatment was interrupted.   He relies on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment), Article 5 (right to liberty and security) and Article 34 (right of individual petition).   Tonderys v. Poland (no. 14382/04) The applicant, Ryszard Tonderys, is a Polish national who was born in 1958 and lives in Wołów (Poland).   He relies on Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security).   Cruz de Carvalho v. Portugal (no. 18223/04) The applicant, José Maria Cruz de Carvalho, is a Portuguese national who was born in 1930 and lives in Lisbon.   He relies, among other provisions, on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Herdade da Comporta – Actividades Agro Silvícolas e Turísticas, S.A. v. Portugal (no.   41453/02) Sociedade Agrícola Herdade da Palma S.A. v. Portugal (no. 31677/04) The applicant companies, Herdade da Comporta – Actividades Agro Silvícolas e Turísticas, S.A. and Sociedade Agrícola Herdade da Palma S.A., are limited companies incorporated under Portuguese law. Their registered offices are in Comporta (Portugal) and Lisbon, respectively. At the time when the application was lodged Herdade da Comporta – Actividades Agro Silvícolas e Turísticas, S.A. was known as The Atlantic Company and was based in Jersey.   The applicant companies rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Kanala v. Slovakia (no. 57239/00) The applicant, Ivan Kanala, is a Slovak national who was born in 1964 and lives in Rožňava (Slovakia).   He relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).     Thursday 12 July 2007   Stankov v. Bulgaria (no. 68490/01) The applicant, Parvan Slavchev Stankov, is a Bulgarian national who was born in 1952 and lives in Sofia.   He relies in particular on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Kovač v. Croatia (no. 503/05) The applicant, Tomislav Kovač, is a Croatian national who was born in 1978 and lives in Virovitica (Croatia).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and § 3 (d) (right to obtain attendance and examination of witnesses).   Testa v. Croatia (no. 20877/04) The applicant, Ksenija Testa, is a Croatian national who was born in 1965 and is currently serving a prison sentence in Požega Penitentiary.   The case concerns Ms Testa’s complaints about her conditions of detention following two convictions for various fraud offences and about interference by the prison authorities with her correspondence.   She relies, in particular, on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment) and Article 8 (right to respect for correspondence).   Jorgic v. Germany (no. 74613/01) The applicant, Nicola Jorgic, is a national of Bosnia and Herzegovina, of Serb origin, who was born in 1946. When he lodged his application, he was serving a sentence of life imprisonment in Bochum (Germany).   The case concerns Mr Jorgic’s complaint about his conviction by the German courts, notably for having committed genocide during the ethnic cleansing which took place in the Doboj region between May and September 1992. He alleged, in particular, that the German courts had not had jurisdiction to convict him and that their wide interpretation of his crime had no basis in German or international law.   He relies on Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security), Article 6 (right to a fair trial) and Article 7 (no punishment without law).   Nanning v. Germany (no. 39741/02) The applicant, Sabine Nanning, is a German national who was born in 1961 and lives in Düsseldorf (Germany).   She relies, in particular, on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life).   a/s Diena and Ozoliņš v. Latvia (no. 16657/03) The applicants are Akciju sabiedrība (a/s) Diena , a Latvian limited company which publishes the daily newspaper with the largest circulation in Latvia ( Diena, “The Day”), and Aivars Ozoliņš, a Latvian national who was born in 1957 and lives in Riga. Mr   Ozoliņš, who is a journalist, was formerly employed by the applicant company as a political commentator.   Relying on Article 10 (freedom of expression), they complained about an order requiring the applicant company to pay damages for publishing in 1998 articles written by Mr Ozoliņš alleged to defame the Latvian Minister of Economic Affairs at the time.   Hauler v. Romania (no. 67703/01) The applicant, Magdalena Hauler, is a Romanian national who was born in 1940 and lives in Carei (Romania).   She relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   SC Ruxandra Trading SRL v. Romania (no. 28333/02) The applicant, SC Ruxandra Trading SRL, is a company incorporated under Romanian law in 1996. Its registered office is in Bucharest.   It relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Magomadov and Magomadov v. Russia (no. 68004/01) The applicants, Yakub Adamovich Magomadov, and his brother, Ayub Adamovich Magomadov, are Russian nationals who were born in 1967 and 1965, respectively. They lived in Chechnya.   The case concerns the detention and disappearance of their brother, Ayubkhan Magomadov, in October 2000. Ayub alleges that his brother, Yakub, also disappeared in suspicious circumstances in April 2004 and maintains that his disappearance was connected with their application to the European Court of Human Rights.   The application refers to Articles 2 (right to life), 3 (prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment), 5 (right to liberty and security) and 34 (right of individual petition).   Nosalskiy v. Ukraine (no. 26277/02) The applicant, Stanislav Andrianovich Nosalskiy, is a Ukrainian national who was born in 1938 and lives in Kharkiv (Ukraine).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).     Repetitive cases   Cornelia Eufrosina Radu v. Romania (no. 65402/01) Săvulescu v. Romania (no. 1696/03) The applicants, Cornelia   Eufrosina Radu and Savu Crivăţ Săvulescu, are Romanian nationals who were born in 1927 and 1941 and live in Târgovişte (Romania) and Bucharest, respectively.   They rely in particular on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Lykov v. Russia (no. 18557/06) Nevolin v. Russia (no. 38103/05) Pylnov v. Russia (no. 7111/05) Telyatyeva v. Russia (no. 18762/06) Vedernikova v. Russia (no. 25580/02) Chukhas v. Ukraine (no. 4078/03) Gorin v. Ukraine (no. 24380/03) Kray v. Ukraine (no. 25426/03) Napalkova v. Ukraine (no. 316/04) Petruk v. Ukraine (no. 25500/03) Rudenko v. Ukraine (no. 19441/03) Uryanskiy v. Ukraine (no. 21003/02) The applicants are five Russian nationals and eight Ukrainian nationals.   They all rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time). With the exception of the cases of Kray , Napalkova , Petruk and Uryanskiy , the applicants also rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property). In the cases of Kray , Napalkova and Rudenko , they further rely on Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases the applicants complain in particular of the excessive length of (non ‑ criminal) proceedings. They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Kozlov v. Ukraine (no. 11084/03) Vyrovyy v. Ukraine (no. 28746/03)   ***   Press contacts Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Beverley Jacobs (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 54 21) Tracey Turner-Tretz (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.