CEDH · PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG — 13 juillet 2007

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   509 13.07.2007   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   17 and 19 July 2007   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 29 Chamber judgments on Tuesday 17 July 2007 and 21 on Thursday 19 July 2007.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     Tuesday 17 July 2007   F. and M. v. Finland (application no. 22508/02)   The applicants, F. and M., are Finnish nationals who were born in 1953 and 1950, respectively.   They rely in particular on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) and § 3 (d) (right to obtain attendance and examination of witnesses) of the European Convention on Human Rights.   Bukta and Others v. Hungary (no. 25691/04) The applicants, Dénesné Bukta, Ferdinánd Laczner and Jánosné Tölgyesi, are Hungarian nationals who were born in 1943, 1945 and 1951, respectively, and live in Budapest.   They rely on Articles 11 (freedom of assembly and association) and 10 (freedom of expression) of the Convention.   Ormanni v. Italy (no. 30278/04) The applicant, Roberto Ormanni, is an Italian national who was born in 1963 and lives in Naples (Italy).   He relies on Article 10 (freedom of expression).   Vitiello v. Italy (no. 6870/03) The applicants, Raffaela Vitiello and Salvatore Vitiello, are Italian nationals who were born in 1952 and 1923 respectively and live in Pompeii (Italy).   They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Gečas v. Lithuania (no. 418/04) The applicant, Algimantas Gečas, is a Lithuanian national who was born in 1966 and lives in the region of Klaipèda (Lithuania).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Gorea v. Moldova (no. 21984/05) The applicant, Grigore Gorea, is a Moldovan national who was born in 1971 and lives in Chişinău.   He relies on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security) and § 3 (right to be brought promptly before a judge).   Bobek v. Poland (no. 68761/01) The applicant, Wanda Bobek, is a Polish national who was born in 1929 and lives in Rzeszów (Poland).   She relies in particular on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Kuc v. Poland (no. 73102/01) The applicant, Jan Kuc, is a Polish national who was born in 1936 and lives in Katowice (Poland). He is currently detained in Racibórz Prison.   He relies on Article 5 § 3 (right to be brought promptly before a judge) and § 4 (right to have lawfulness of detention decided speedily by a court) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Rosińki v. Poland (no. 17373/02) The applicant, Jerzy Rosiński, is a Polish national who was born in 1934 and lives in Warsaw.   He relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Sanocki v. Poland (no. 28949/03) The applicant, Janusz Sanocki, is a Polish national who was born in 1954 and lives in Nysa (Poland).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 10 (freedom of expression).   Szmajchel v. Poland (no. 21541/03) The applicant, Władysław Szmajchel, is a Polish national who was born in 1946 and is currently in prison in Bydgoszcz (Poland).   He relies on Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security).   Jevremović v. Serbia (no. 3150/05) The applicants, Ina Jevremović, and her mother, Ljiljana Jevremović are Serbian nationals who live in Belgrade.   They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time), Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination).   Kučera v. Slovakia (no. 48666/99) The applicant, Pavel Kučera, is a Slovakian national who was born in 1962 and lives in Považská Bystrica (Slovakia).   He relies on Articles 5 (right to liberty and security) and 8 (right to respect for private and family life).   Hanbayat v. Turkey (no. 18378/02) The applicant, Aydın Hanbayat, is a Turkish national who was born in 1962. He died in June 2005.   He relies on Article 5 § 3 (right to be brought promptly before a judge) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Kadayıfçı and Others v. Turkey (nos. 16480/03, 16486/03 and 28128/03) Tozkoparan and Others v. Turkey (no. 29138/03) Yurtöven v. Turkey (no. 21850/03) The eight applicants are all Turkish nationals.   They all rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property). In the case of Kadayıfçı and Others the applicants also rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v. Turkey (no. 52658/99) The applicants, Mehmet Yiğit and Suna Yiğit, are Turkish nationals who were born in 1970 and 1969 respectively and live in Diyarbakır.   They rely in particular on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing), Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life).   Satılmış and Others v. Turkey (nos. 74611/01, 26876/02 and 27628/02) The 42 applicants are all Turkish nationals who live in Istanbul.   They rely in particular on Article 11 (freedom of assembly and association).   Zerey and Others v. Turkey (nos. 33412/02, 30229/02 and 30263/02) The applicants, Ekrem Zerey, Rıfat Demir, Mehmet Garip Özer, Ahmet Şahin, Ahmet Durmaz and Davut Şahin, are Turkish nationals who were born in 1965, 1973, 1967, 1971, 1966 and 1970 respectively. At the time of their application to the Court, Ekrem Zerey was in Mardin Prison and the other applicants were in Diyarbakır Prison (Turkey).   They rely on Article 5 (right to liberty and security).     Repetitive cases   In the following cases the applicants raise complaints which have already been submitted to the Court in previous cases.   Morselli v. Italy (no. 22697/04) Akdaş and Others v. Turkey (nos. 23901/02, 23909/02, 23912/02, 23916/02 and 23952/02) Bağcı and Others v. Turkey (no. 73068/01)     Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases, the applicants, relying on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time), complain in particular about the excessive length of (non-criminal) proceedings.   Nagler and Nalimmo B.V.B.A. v. Belgium (no. 40628/04) Andria Oy and Kari Karanko v. Finland (no. 61557/00) Wawrzynowicz v. Poland (no. 73192/01) Samardžić and AD Plastika v. Serbia (no. 28443/05) Naime Doğan and Others v. Turkey (no. 76091/01)     Thursday 19 July 2007   Podoreški v. Croatia (no. 13587/03) The applicant, Zorica Podoreški, is a Croatian national who lives in Sisak (Croatia).   She relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Aresti Charalambous v. Cyprus (no. 43151/04) The applicant, Aresti Charalambous, is a Cypriot national who was born in 1972 and lives in Nicosia.   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and Article 12 (right to marry).   Freitag v. Germany (no. 71440/01) The applicant, Karl-Walter Freitag, is a German national who was born in 1954 and lives in Cologne (Germany).   He relies, in particular, on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Kambangu v. Lithuania (no. 59619/00) The applicant, Pedro Katunda Kambangu, is an Angolan national who was born in 1968 and lives in Houston (United States of America).   He relies on Article 5 (right to liberty and security).   Krasnov and Skuratov v. Russia (nos. 17864/04 and 21396/04) The applicants, Aleksandr Viktorovich Krasnov and Yuriy Ilyich Skuratov, are Russian nationals who were born in 1956 and 1952 respectively, and live in Moscow.   They rely in particular on Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 (right to free elections).   Kondrashina v. Russia (no. 69533/01) The applicant, Nadezhda Korneyevna Kondrashina, was a Russian national who was born in 1934 and lived in Belgorod (Russia).   She relied on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Rozhkov v. Russia (no. 64140/00) The applicant, Yevgeniy Ivanovich Rozhkov, is a Russian national who was born in 1966 and lives in Belgorod (Russia).   He relies in particular on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and Article 5 § 4 (right to have lawfulness of detention decided speedily by a court).   Trepashkin v. Russia (no. 36898/03) The applicant, Mikhail Ivanovich Trepashkin, is a Russian national who was born 1957 and lives in Moscow.   He relies on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and 5 (right to liberty and security).   Feyzi Yıldırım v. Turkey (no. 40074/98) The applicant, Feyzi Yıldırım, is a Turkish national who was born in 1965 and lives in Istanbul.   He relies on Article 2 (right to life), Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Garbul v. Turkey (no. 64447/01) The applicant, Hikmettin Garbul, is a Turkish national who was born in 1967 and was serving his sentence in Aydın Prison at the time of his application to the Court.   He relies on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Halis Tekin v. Turkey (no. 64570/01) The applicant, Halis Tekin, is a Turkish national who was born in 1971 and lives in Batman (Turkey).   He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Kemal Koçak v. Turkey (no. 40991/98) The applicant, Kemal Koçak, is a Turkish national who was born in 1960 and lives in Van (Turkey).   He relies on Articles 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) and 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Tuş and Others v. Turkey (nos. 7144/02 and 39865/02) The eight applicants are all Turkish nationals who live or who are detained in Izmir (Turkey).   They rely on Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) and Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life).     Repetitive cases   Popescu and Daşoveanu v. Romania (no. 24681/03) Rusu and Others v. Romania (no. 4198/04) The applicants are five Romanian nationals.   They rely, in particular, on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 6 §   1 (right to a fair hearing).   Bakharev v. Russia (no. 21932/03) Zverev and Others v. Russia (no. 13296/03) The applicants are four Russian nationals.   They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Martı v. Turkey (no. 9709/03) Mesut Yurtsever v. Turkey (no. 42086/02) Öz and Yürekli v. Turkey (no. 44662/98) The applicants are four Turkish nationals.   They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).     Length-of-proceedings case   In the following case, the applicant, relying on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time), complains in particular about the excessive length of (non-criminal) proceedings.   Zisis v. Greece (no. 77658/01)   ***   Press contacts Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Tracey Turner-Tretz (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.