CEDH · PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG — 7 décembre 2007

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   890 7.12.2007   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   11 and 13 December 2007   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing nine Chamber judgments on Tuesday 11 December 2007 and 28 on Thursday 13 December 2007.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     Tuesday 11 December 2007   Gogoladze v. Georgia (application no. 4683/03) The applicant, Nunu Gogoladze, is a Georgian national who was born in 1954 and lives in Tbilisi (Georgia). She relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights.   Drassich v. Italy (no. 25575/04) The applicant, Mauro Drassich, is an Italian national who was born in 1958 and lives in Trieste (Italy). He relies on Article 6 of the Convention (right to a fair trial).   Pêcheur v. Luxembourg (no. 16308/02) The applicant, Jacques Pêcheur, is a French national who was born in 1933. At the time when his application was lodged with the Court he was detained in Schrassig Prison (Luxembourg). He relies on Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Cengiz Polat v. Turkey (no. 40593/04) The applicant, Cengiz Polat, is a Turkish national who was born in 1965 and is currently detained in Edirne Prison (Turkey). He relies on Article 5 (right to liberty and security) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Karakoyun and Turan v. Turkey (no. 18482/03) The applicants, Mehmet Nuri Karakoyun and Mehmet Salih Turan, are Turkish nationals who were born in 1971 and 1977 respectively and live in Istanbul (Turkey). They rely in particular on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and Article 10 (freedom of expression).   K.Ö. v. Turkey (no. 71795/01) The applicant, K.Ö., is a Turkish national who was born in 1950 and lives in Adana (Turkey). She relies on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment and lack of an effective investigation), Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) and Article 34 (right of individual petition).   Nurhan Yılmaz v. Turkey (no. 21164/03) The applicant, Nurhan Yılmaz, is a Turkish national who was born in 1978 and lives in Izmir. She relies, in particular, on Article 6 (right to a fair trial).     Repetitive case   The following case raises an issue which has already been submitted to the Court.   Aslan and Others v. Turkey (nos. 75202/01, 9820/02 and 27942/02) The applicants rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Length-of-proceedings case   In the following case, the applicant complains in particular about the excessive length of (non-criminal) proceedings, in breach of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time). He also relies on Article 13 (right to an effective remedy)   Tangredi v. Italy (no. 32747/02)     Thursday 13 December 2007   Gashi v. Croatia (no. 32457/05) The applicant, Shani Gashi, was a Croatian national who was born in 1962 and lived in Pula (Croatia). He died in April 2007. He relied on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Mooren v. Germany (no. 11364/03) The applicant, Burghard Theodor Mooren, is a German national who was born in 1963 and was living in Mönchengladbach (Germany) at the time of his application to the Court. He relies, in particular, on Article 5 (right to liberty and security).   Valer Pop v. Romania (no. 26511/04) The applicant, Valer Pop, is a Romanian national who was born in 1944 and lives in Mangalia (Romania). He relies in particular on Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Emonet and Others v. Switzerland (no. 39051/03) The applicants, Isabelle Chantal Emonet, Mariannick Faucherre and Roland Emonet, are Swiss nationals who were born in 1971, 1946 and 1948 respectively and live in Geneva. They rely in particular on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life).   Foglia v. Switzerland (no. 35865/04) The applicant, Aldo Foglia, is a Swiss national who was born in 1953 and lives in Lugano (Switzerland). He relies on Articles 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and 10 (freedom of expression).   Akın Birdal v. Turkey (no. 47520/99) The applicant, Akın Birdal, is a Turkish national who was born in 1948 and lives in Ankara. He relies in particular on Articles 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial), 7 (no punishment without law) and 10 (freedom of expression).   Dağtekin and Others v. Turkey (no. 70516/01) The applicants are five Turkish nationals who live in Şanlıurfa (Turkey). They rely on Article   6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Eser Ceylan v.Turkey (no. 14166/02) The applicant, Eser Ceylan, is a Turkish national who was born in 1975 and lives in Ankara. She relies on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment).   Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines v. Turkey (no. 40998/98) The applicant, the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, is an Iranian shipping company registered in Teheran. The applicant company relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Bakay v. Turkey (no. 9464/02) Çem v. Turkey (no. 4819/02) Öz and Nas v. Turkey (nos. 31941/03 and 31944/03) Özcan v. Turkey (no. 2209/03) Uğuz v. Turkey (no. 31932/03) Uysal and Osal v. Turkey (no. 1206/03) The applicants are eight Turkish nationals. They all rely, in particular, on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time). The applicant in Özcan also relies on Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Romanova v. Ukraine (no. 33089/02) The applicant, Tatyana Leonidovna Romanova, is a Ukrainian national who was born in 1951 and lives in Mykolayv (Ukraine). She relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Tkachev v. Ukraine (no. 39458/02) The applicant, Kirill Aleksandrovich Tkachev, is a Ukrainian national who was born in 1977 and is currently serving a sentence of life imprisonment in Zhvyrka (Ukraine). He relies, in particular, on Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security).     Repetitive cases   The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court.   Suciu Werle v. Romania (no. 26521/05) The applicant relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Karakaş and Tandoğan v. Turkey (nos. 33452/02 and 33457/02) The applicants rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Kenar v. Turkey (no. 67215/01) The applicant relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Sinitsyna v. Russia (no. 2814/04) Kachanov v. Ukraine (no. 9062/04) Kolnoochenko and Others v. Ukraine (nos. 12636/03, 14118/03, 33393/03 and 36734/03) The applicants all rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing). With the exception of Kachanov they also rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).     Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases, the applicants complain in particular about the excessive length of (non-criminal) proceedings, in breach of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time). The applicants in the cases of Šakanovič , Šramel and Tomažič also rely on Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Angelova v. Russia (no. 33820/04) Šakanovič v. Slovenia (no. 32989/02) Šramel v. Slovenia (no. 39154/02) Tomažič v. Slovenia (no. 38350/02) Şencan v. Turkey (no. 7436/02)   ***   Press contacts Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Tracey Turner-Tretz (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30) Paramy Chanthalangsy (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 54 91)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.