CEDH · PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG — 14 décembre 2007

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sA0E3514A { width:151.86pt; display:inline-block } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   924 14.12.2007   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   18 and 20 December 2007   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing 20 Chamber judgments on Tuesday 18 December 2007 and 14 on Thursday 20 December 2007.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     Tuesday 18 December 2007   Bajrami v. Albania (application no. 35853/04)   Revision The applicant, Agim Bajrami, was an ethnic Albanian from Kosovo who was born in 1964 and lived in Lipjan, Kosovo (Serbia). The Albanian Government asked for the European Court of Human Rights’ judgment in this case (12 December 2006) to be revised because the applicant died on 10 November 2006.   Dybeku v. Albania (no. 41153/06) The applicant, Ilir Dybeku, is an Albanian national who was born in 1971 and is currently serving a prison sentence in Pequin High Security Prison (Albania). He relies, in particular, on Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights.   Marini v. Albania (no. 3738/02) The applicant, Vlash Marini, is an Albanian national who was born in 1936 and lives in Tirana. He relies, in particular, on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time), Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) to the Convention.   Pejaković and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (nos. 337/04, 36022/04 and 45219/04) The applicants are three citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Čedomir Pejaković and Dragomir Kusić live in Bosnia and Herzegovina and were born in 1932 and 1944, respectively. Ružica Pejić lives in Belgium and was born in 1942. They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Rydz v. Poland (no. 13167/02) The applicant, Henryk Rydz, is a Polish national who was born in 1976 and lives in Brzeg (Poland). He relies on Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) and Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).     Abidin Şahin v. Turkey (no. 45559/04) The applicant, Abidin Şahin, is a Turkish national who was born in 1960 and lives in Gaziantep (Turkey). He relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Erkan Soylu v. Turkey (no. 74657/01) The applicant, Erkan Soylu, is a Turkish national who was born in 1973 and lives in Bursa (Turkey). He relies on Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 (right to liberty and security).   Nurettin Aldemir and Others v. Turkey (nos. 32124/02, 32126/02, 32129/02, 32132/02, 32133/02, 32137/02 and 32138/02) The applicants are eight Turkish nationals who live in Ankara and Istanbul. They are members of “EĞİTİM-SEN” (The Education Workers’ Trade Union). They rely, in particular, on Article   3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), Article 11 (freedom of assembly and association) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).     Repetitive cases   The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court.   Bertolini v. Italy (no. 14448/03) The applicant in this case relies, in particular, on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing), Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), Article 13 (right to an effective remedy), Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (freedom of movement).     Sevgili v. Turkey (no. 27402/03) The applicant in this case relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases, the applicants complain in particular about the excessive length of (non-criminal) proceedings, in breach of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time). The applicant in the case of Swat also relies on Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Aragosa v. Italy (no. 20191/03) Buonfardieci v. Italy (no. 39933/03) Biszta v. Poland (no. 4922/02) Olesiński v. Poland (no. 12550/02) Olszewska v. Poland (no. 13024/05) Swat v. Poland (no. 13545/03) Jakubička and Magyaricsová v. Slovakia (no. 16126/05) Španír v. Slovakia (no. 39139/05) Vičanová v. Slovakia (no. 3305/04) Weiss v. Slovakia (no. 28652/803)     Thursday 20 December 2007   Paykar Yev Haghtanak Ltd v. Armenia (no. 21638/03) The applicant, Paykar Yev Haghtanak Ltd, is a private trading company in Yerevan (Armenia).   It relies, in particular, on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria (no. 7888/03) The applicants, Krastinka Petrova Nikolova and Violeta Atanasova Velichkova, are Bulgarian nationals who were born in 1939 and 1960, respectively, and live in Shumen (Bulgaria). They are the widow and daughter of Atanas Velichkov Nikolov who died in October 1994 following alleged ill-treatment by two police officers. They rely, in particular, on Article 2 (right to life) and Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment).   Phinikaridou v. Cyprus (no. 23890/02) The applicant, Yannoula Phinikaridou, is a Cypriot national who was born in 1945 and lives in Nicosia. She relies on Article 6 §   1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life).   Iosif and Others v. Romania (no. 10443/03) The applicants, Aurel Iosif, Doina-Maria Iosif and Daliana-Magdalena Boboşilă-Iosif, are Romanian nationals who were born in 1938, 1942 and 1969 respectively and live in Bucharest. They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Miclici v. Romania (no. 23657/03) The applicant, Marian Miclici, is a Romanian national who was born in 1950 and lives in Montreal (Canada). He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Nikolov v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (no. 41195/02) The applicant, Zlatko Nikolov, is a Macedonian national who was born in 1949 and lives in Štip (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia). He relies, in particular, on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).   Repetitive cases   The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court.   Breţcanu v. Romania (no. 24471/04) The applicants in this case rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Kocsis v. Romania (no. 10395/02) The applicant in this case relies, in particular, on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Aleksandr Zhukov v. Russia (no. 35760/04) Gaykovych v. Ukraine (no. 38931/02) Nefedov v. Ukraine (30855/05) Ptashko v. Ukraine (no. 6974/04) In the above four cases, the applicants all rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing). With the exception of Nefedov they also rely on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property). The applicants in Gaykovych and Nefedov also rely on Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).     Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases, the applicants complain in particular about the excessive length of (non-criminal) proceedings, in breach of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time).   Rey and Others v. Sweden (no. 17350/03) Lebedeva v. Ukraine (no. 18345/03)   ***   Press contacts Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Tracey Turner-Tretz (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30) Paramy Chanthalangsy (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 54 91)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.