CEDH · PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG — 18 janvier 2008

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   033 18.1.2008   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   22 and 24 January 2008   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing ten Chamber judgments on Tuesday 22 January 2008 and 22 on Thursday 24 January 2008.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     Tuesday 22 January 2008   Bobel v. Poland (application no. 20138/03) Kurczewski v. Poland (no. 18157/04) Pisarkiewicz v. Poland (no. 18967/02) Teodorski v. Poland (no. 7033/06) The applicants are four Polish nationals who live in Poland. Piotr Bobel was born in 1972 and lives in Olsztyn, Paweł Kurczewski was born in 1979 and lives in Gdańsk, Dariusz Pisakiewicz was born in 1957 and lived in Łódź and Leszek Teodorski was born in 1974 and lives in Warsaw. All the applicants rely on Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and Mr Bobel also relies on Article 8 (right to respect for correspondence) of the Convention.     Repetitive cases   The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court.   Goodwin v. the United Kingdom (no. 65723/01) Herbert v. the United Kingdom (no. 62868/00) Higham v. the United Kingdom (no. 64735/01) In these three cases, the applicants rely on Articles 14 (prohibition of discrimination) and 1 of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property). In the case of Herbert , the applicant also relies on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life).     Length-of-proceedings cases   In the following cases, the applicants complain in particular about the excessive length of (non-criminal) proceedings, in breach of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time). The applicant in the case of Rygalski also relies on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Czaus v. Poland (no. 18026/03) Madeła v. Poland (no. 62424/00) Rygalski v. Poland (no. 11101/04)     Thursday 24 January 2008   Riad and Idiab v. Belgium (nos 29787/03 and 29810/03) The applicants, Mohamad Riad and Abdelhadi Idiab, are Palestinian nationals who were born in 1980 and 1981 respectively and live in Lebanon. The applications concern in particular the conditions in which the applicants were detained in the transit zone of Brussels airport following their unlawful entry into Belgium. The applicants rely on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment), 5 (right to liberty and security) and 8 (right to respect for private and family life).   Milan v. France (no. 7549/03) The applicant, Daniel Milan, is a French national who was born in 1947 and lives in Nice (France). He complains that he was subjected to acts of violence by police officers during his arrest and police custody in October 2001, on suspicion of making death threats in connection with a terrorist undertaking. He relies on Articles 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment) and 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Kulcsár v. Hungary (no. 37778/04) The applicant, Jenő Kulcsár, is a Hungarian national who was born in 1949 and lives in Budapest. He relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   di Giacomo v. Italy (no. 25522/03) The applicant, Giovanni di Giacomo, is an Italian national who was born in 1954 and is currently serving a prison sentence in Palmi (Italy). He relies on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and on Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) in conjunction with Article 8.   Ž. v. Latvia (no. 14755/03) The applicant, Ž., is a Latvian national who was born in 1959 and is currently serving a prison sentence in Jēkabpils Prison (Latvia). He relies on Articles 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) and 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).   Maslova and Nalbandov v. Russia (no. 839/02) The applicants are two Russian nationals who live in Nizhniy Novgorod (Russia). Olga Yuryevna Maslova was born in 1980 and Fedor Vartanovich Nalbandov was born in 1982. They allege, in particular, that they had been subjected to ill-treatment by State officials in November 1999 during an interrogation in connection with a murder case. They rely on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment and lack of an effective investigation), 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Çoban and Others v. Turkey (no. 2620/05) The four applicants, Huri Çoban, Ayşe Çoban, Nazım Çoban and Cihan Çoban, are Turkish nationals who were born in 1966, 1943, 1942 and 1985, respectively, and who live in Ankara (Turkey). They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).   Erseven and Others v. Turkey (no. 27225/02) The applicants are nine Turkish nationals who live in Turkey. They rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial).   Karabulut v. Turkey (no. 56015/00) The applicant, Ali Karabulut, is a Turkish national who was born in 1973 and is currently serving a prison sentence in Kırşehir (Turkey). He was found guilty of membership of the Revolutionary People’s Liberation Party/Front-Revolutionary Left. He complains, in particular, that he had been subjected to ill-treatment while he was detained in police custody, about the excessive length of his detention and about the unfairness of the criminal proceedings against him. He relies on Articles 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), 5 (right to liberty and security), 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) and 7 (no punishment without law).   Karakaya v. Turkey (no. 11424/03) The applicant, Emin Karakaya, is a Turkish national who was born in 1956 and lives in Istanbul. He relies on Articles 6 (right to a fair hearing) and 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Osmanoğlu v. Turkey (no. 48804/99) The applicant, Muhyettin   Osmanoğlu, is a Turkish national who was born in 1942 and lives in Diyarbakır (Turkey). He alleges, in particular, that his son was taken into police custody in 1996 and had subsequently disappeared in circumstances engaging the responsibility of Turkey. He relies on Articles 2 (right to life), 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), 5 (right to liberty and security), 8 (right to respect for private and family life), 13 (right to an effective remedy) and 14 (prohibition of discrimination).     Repetitive cases   The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court.   Babeş v. Romania (no. 11601/03) Ion v. Romania (no. 19436/04) Aldea v. Romania (no. 36992/03) Lesnova v. Russia (no. 37645/04) Nagovitsyn v. Russia (no. 6859/02) Parfenenkov v. Russia (no. 12115/03) Can and Others v. Turkey (no. 29189/02) Korkmaz v. Turkey (no. 35758/03) Saripinar v. Turkey (nos 42756/04 and 42795/04) Gög & Kolsuzoğlu and Agbayır v. Turkey (nos. 10332/02 and 25805/02) In these cases the applicants rely on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property).     Length-of-proceedings case   In the following case, the applicant complains in particular about the excessive length of (non-criminal) proceedings, in breach of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time). The applicant also relies on Article 13 (right to an effective remedy).   Bunčič v. Slovenia (no. 42852/02)   ***   Press contacts Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) Stéphanie Klein (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 21 54) Tracey Turner-Tretz (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30) Paramy Chanthalangsy (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 54 91)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.