CEDH · PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG — 30 avril 2009

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline }   362 30.04.2009   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   5 and 7 May 2009   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing eight Chamber judgments on Tuesday 5 May 2009 and three on Thursday 7 May 2009.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     Tuesday 5 May 2009   Sellem v. Italy (application no. 12584/08) The applicant, Ezzedine Ben Edris Sellem, is a Tunisian national who was born in 1967 and lives in Milan (Italy). Relying on Articles   3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment), 6 (right to a fair hearing) and   8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights, he alleges that enforcement of the decision to deport him to Tunisia, where he was sentenced in absentia to ten years’ imprisonment for being a member of a terrorist organisation, would, among other things, expose him to risks of torture.   Gavrileanu v. Romania (no. 18037/02) The applicant, Ioan Gavrileanu, was a Romanian national who was born in 1935 and lived in Suceava (Romania). In a judgment of 22   February 2007 the Court found a violation of Article   6   §   1 (right to a fair hearing) and of Article 1   of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property) in relation to a plot of land that had belonged to the applicant, and considered that the question of the application of Article   41 (just satisfaction) was not ready for decision.   Gürsel Çelik v. Turkey (no. 5243/03) The applicant, Gürsel Çelik, is a Turkish national who was born in 1966. At the time of his application he was serving a prison sentence for being a member of an illegal organisation, the PKK (Workers’ Party of Kurdistan). Relying on Article   6   §§   1 and   3   (c) (right to a fair hearing), the applicant complains, among other things, that the criminal proceedings against him were unfair.   Özer v. Turkey (nos. 35721/04 and 3832/05) The applicant, Aziz Özer, is a Turkish national who was born in 1964 and lives in Istanbul. He is the owner and editor of the monthly publication Yeni Dünya İçin Çağrı (“Call for a new world”), whose registered office is in Istanbul. He also owns a publishing company, Çağrı Basın Yayın Ltd. Şti., likewise based in Istanbul. Relying on Article   10 (freedom of expression), Article   6   §   1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property), he complains about his convictions for publishing an article and printing a leaflet.     Repetitive cases   The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court.   Just satisfaction Labbruzzo v. Italy (no. 10022/02) In a judgment of 5 October 2006 the Court found a violation of Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property) in relation to a plot of land belonging to the applicants, and considered that the question of the application of Article   41 (just satisfaction) was not ready for decision.   Bindea v. Romania (no. 32297/04) Forna v. Romania (no. 34999/03) In these cases the applicants rely on Article   6   §   1 (right to a fair hearing) and Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property).   Yavuz and Others v. Turkey (no. 9923/05, 13021/05, 13186/05, 13809/05, 13810/05, 14622/05, 14650/05, 14662/05, 14698/05, 14704/05, 14707/05, 14837/05 and 26912/05) The applicants rely on Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property) and Article   6   §   1 (right to a fair hearing).     Thursday 7 May 2009   Kalacheva v. Russia (no. 3451/05) The applicant, Anna Anatolyevna Kalacheva, is a Russian national who was born in 1978 and lives in Astrakhan (Russia). Relying in particular on Article   8 (right to respect for private and family life), she complains that the domestic courts have failed to establish the paternity of her daughter’s biological father regardless of the results of a DNA test.     Repetitive case   The following case raises an issue which has already been submitted to the Court   Sivukhin v. Russia (no. 31049/05) The applicant relies on Article   6   §   1 (right to a fair hearing).     Length-of-proceedings case   In the following case, the applicant complains in particular under Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) about the excessive length of civil proceedings.   Bogdanska Duma v. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (no. 24660/03)   ***   Press contacts Stefano Piedimonte (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 04) Tracey Turner-Tretz (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30) Paramy Chanthalangsy (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 28 30) Kristina Pencheva-Malinowski (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 70) Céline Menu-Lange (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 58 77)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.