CEDH · PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG — 1 juillet 2009

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s69BE285C { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:85.05pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-85.05pt } .s9A223E1B { width:11.03pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s595A57E4 { width:85.05pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .s3CED24E9 { width:27.05pt; text-indent:0pt; display:inline-block } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt }   532 01.07.2009     Press release issued by the Registrar   GRAND CHAMBER HEARING ČUDAK v. LITHUANIA   The European Court of Human Rights is holding a Grand Chamber hearing today Wednesday 1 July 2009 at 9.15 a.m. , in the case of Čudak v. Lithuania (application no. 15869/02).   The hearing will be broadcast from 2.30 p.m. on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     ****   The case concerns an application brought by a Lithuanian national, Alicija Čudak who was born in 1961 and lives in Vilnius.   In 1999, following a sexual harassment case, Ms Čudak was dismissed by the Polish embassy in Lithuania, where she had been working as a receptionist and telephonist. She brought an action for unfair dismissal before the civil courts, which declined jurisdiction on the basis of the doctrine of State immunity from jurisdiction, as invoked by the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs.   Relying on Article 6 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights, the applicant alleges that she was denied access to a court.   The application was lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 4 December 2001 and declared admissible on 2 March 2006. On 27 January 2009 the Chamber to which the case had been allocated relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber, under Article 30 [1] of the Convention.   Composition of the Court   The case will be heard by the Grand Chamber composed as follows:   Jean-Paul Costa (France), President , Christos Rozakis (Greece), Nicolas Bratza (the United Kingdom), Peer Lorenzen (Denmark), Françoise Tulkens (Belgium), Josep Casadevall (Andorra), Ireneu Cabral Barreto (Portugal) Corneliu Bîrsan (Romania), Vladimiro Zagrebelsky (Italy), David Thór Björgvinsson (Iceland), Dragoljub Popović (Serbia), Ineta Ziemele (Latvia), Mark Villiger (Liechtenstein), Giorgio Malinverni (Switzerland), András Sajó (Hungary), Nona Tsotsoria (Georgia), Işıl Karakaş (Turkey), judges , Ann Power (Ireland), Nina Vajić (Croatia), Alvina Gyulumyan (Armenia), substitute judges , and also Johan Callewaert , Deputy Grand Chamber Registrar .   Representatives of the parties   Government :   Elvyra Baltutytė , Agent ,   Karolina Bubnytė-Montvydienė , Adviser ;   Applicant :   Krzysztof Uczkiewicz , Counsel ,   Bogdana Slupska - Uczkiewicz , Adviser.   *** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date [2] .   Press contacts Stefano Piedimonte (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 04) Tracey Turner-Tretz (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30) Paramy Chanthalangsy (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 28 30) Kristina Pencheva-Malinowski (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 70) Céline Menu-Lange (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 90 21 58 77)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights. [1] Where a case pending before a Chamber raises a serious question affecting the interpretation of the Convention or the protocols thereto, or where the resolution of a question before the Chamber might have a result inconsistent with a judgment previously delivered by the Court, the Chamber may, at any time before it has rendered its judgment, relinquish jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber, unless one of the parties to the case objects. [2] This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.