CEDH · PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG — 15 septembre 2009

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA678F94A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right; font-size:11pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s11AD46B1 { font-family:Arial; font-size:7.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE0D34C67 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s4BAE41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt } .s92A5AB2 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s1F6AC3E7 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-style:italic } .s99A63BFE { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; font-size:11pt } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sBACB86A2 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 }   655 15.9.2009   Press release issued by the Registrar   Chamber judgments [1] concerning Finland, Latvia, Poland, Romania and   Turkey   Strasbourg, 15.09.2009 - The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following 13   Chamber judgments, which can be accessed by clicking on the respective application number of the case. [2]     Aiminen v. Finland (application no. 24732/06 ) Violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) Just satisfaction: 2,500   euros (EUR) (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR 2,500   (costs and expenses)   Pacula v. Latvia (no. 65014/01 ) Violation of Article   6   §§   1 and 3 (d) (right to a fair hearing) (First episode) No violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) (Second episode) Violation of Article 8 (right to respect for correspondence) No violation of Article 34 (right of individual petition) Just satisfaction: the applicant made no claim   Arciński v. Poland (no. 41373/04 ) Violation of Article 6 § 1 in conjunction with Article   6   §   3 (c) (right to a fair trial) Just satisfaction: EUR 1,000   (non-pecuniary damage) .   Giermek and Others v. Poland (no. 6669/03 ) Two violations of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing / right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) Just satisfaction: EUR 3,900 (non-pecuniary damage) each to the first, second and fourth applicant.   Jamroży v. Poland (no . 6093/04 ) Violation of Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) Just satisfaction: EUR 1,500 (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR 800 (costs and expenses)   Lorenc v. Poland (no. 28604/03 ) Violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) Just satisfaction: EUR 5,000 (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR 800 (costs and expenses)   Rasidescu v. Romania (no. 39761/03 ) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) The question of the application of Article   41 (just satisfaction) is not ready for decision.   Tamir and Others v. Romania (no. 42194/05 ) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property) Just satisfaction: EUR   181,000 (pecuniary damage) and EUR 1,000 (costs and expenses), jointly to 6 applicants.   Arzu v. Turkey (no. 1915/03 ) Violation of Article 5 § 3 (right to liberty and security) Violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) in conjunction with Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) Violation of Article 6 § 1(right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) Just satisfaction: EUR   10,600 (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR 2,500 (costs and expenses)   Etem Karagöz v. Turkey (no. 32008/05 ) Violation of Article 5 §§ 3 and 4 (right to liberty and security) Violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) Just satisfaction: EUR   15,600 (non-pecuniary damage) and 3,000 (costs and expenses)   Güli Kara v. Turkey (no. 30944/04 ) Violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) Just satisfaction: the applicant made no claim   Hatipoğlu v. Turkey (no. 23945/05 ) Violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) Just satisfaction: EUR 2,350 (costs and expenses)   İhsan Baran v. Turkey (No. 1) (no. 8180/04 ) Violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) in conjunction with Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) Just satisfaction: EUR   1,000 (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR   1,000 (costs and expenses)     ***   These summaries by the Registry do not bind the Court. The full texts of the Court’s judgments are accessible on its Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).   Press contacts Stefano Piedimonte (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 04) Tracey Turner-Tretz (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30) Kristina Pencheva-Malinowski (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 70) Céline Menu-Lange (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 90 21 58 77) Frédéric Dolt (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 90 21 53 39)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights. [1] Under Article 43 of the European Convention on Human Rights, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court. In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general importance, in which case the Grand Chamber will deliver a final judgment. If no such question or issue arises, the panel will reject the request, at which point the judgment becomes final. Otherwise Chamber judgments become final on the expiry of the three-month period or earlier if the parties declare that they do not intend to make a request to refer. [2] Those marked with * are available in French only.