CEDHPRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
CEDH · PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG — 17 septembre 2009
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:003-2846741-3141974
- Date
- 17 septembre 2009
- Publication
- 17 septembre 2009
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulAnalyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA678F94A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right; font-size:11pt } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .sBACB86A2 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE0D34C67 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s4BAE41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt } .s92A5AB2 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s99A63BFE { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; font-size:11pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt }   665 17.09.2009   Press release issued by the Registrar   Chamber judgments [1] concerning Russia and   “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”   Strasbourg, 17.09.2009 - The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following five Chamber judgments which can be accessed by clicking on the respective application number of the case [2] .     Borodkin v. Russia (application no. 42234/04 ) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) Just satisfaction: 3,382   euros   (EUR) (pecuniary damage) and EUR   2,000 (non-pecuniary damage)   Kozlov v. Russia ( no. 30782/03 )* No violation of Article 6 (right to a fair trial)   Yevdokimov v. Russia ( no. 17183/05 ) Violation of Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security) Just satisfaction: EUR   300 (non-pecuniary damage)   Zharkova v. Russia ( no. 32380/06 ) Violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) Just satisfaction: EUR   4,800 (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR   31 (costs and expenses)   Bočvarska v. “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” ( no. 27865/02 ) Violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) Just satisfaction: EUR   1,600 (non-pecuniary damage) and EUR   1,000 (costs and expenses)     ***   A brief description of the cases can be found in the Announce of judgments 15-17.09).   Press contacts Stefano Piedimonte (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 04) Tracey Turner-Tretz (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30) Kristina Pencheva-Malinowski (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 70) Céline Menu-Lange (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 90 21 58 77) Frédéric Dolt (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 90 21 53 39)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights. [1] Under Article 43 of the European Convention on Human Rights, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court. In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general importance, in which case the Grand Chamber will deliver a final judgment. If no such question or issue arises, the panel will reject the request, at which point the judgment becomes final. Otherwise Chamber judgments become final on the expiry of the three-month period or earlier if the parties declare that they do not intend to make a request to refer. [2] Those marked with * are available in French only.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
- Date
- 17 septembre 2009
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:003-2846741-3141974
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel