CEDH · PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG — 9 avril 2010

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA678F94A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right; font-size:11pt } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4BAE41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt } .sA101A847 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s92A5AB2 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s99A63BFE { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; font-size:11pt } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   297 09.04.2010   Press release issued by the Registrar   FORTHCOMING CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   13 April 2010   The European Court of Human Rights will be notifying in writing eight   Chamber judgments on Tuesday 13   April 2010.   Press releases and texts of the judgments will be available at 11 a.m. (local time) on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).     Trabelsi v. Italy (no. 50163/08) The applicant, Mourad Trabelsi, is a Tunisian national who was born in 1969. He had been living in Italy since 1986, with his wife, a Tunisian national, and his three young children, born in Italy, when he was deported to Tunisia in December 2008 following his criminal conviction for acts of terrorism. The expulsion went ahead even though the Court, applying Rule 39 (interim measures), had indicated to the Italian authorities in November 2008 that the applicant should not be deported until further notice. Mr Trabelsi is currently in detention in Tunisia. Relying on Articles   3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment), 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and   34 (right of individual petition) of the European Convention on Human Rights, he complained about his expulsion.   Krivošej v. Serbia (no. 42559/08) The applicant, Ana Krivošej, is a Serbian national of Russian origin who was born in 1969 and lives in Niš (Serbia). The case concerns Ms Krivošej’s complaint about the domestic courts’ non-enforcement of access rights to her son, born in 1994, and who was put into the custody of his father in 2002. She relies in particular on Article   6   § 1 (right to a fair hearing), Article   8 (right to respect for private and family life) and Article   13 (right to an effective remedy).   Charahili v. Turkey (no. 46605/07) Keshmiri v. Turkey (no. 36370/08) Ranjbar and Others v. Turkey (no. 37040/07) Tehrani and Others v. Turkey (nos. 32940/08, 41626/08 and 43616/08) The applicants are one Tunisian, Malek Charahili, currently held in the Kırklareli Foreigners’ Admission and Accommodation Centre in Turkey, and ten Iranian nationals: Mansour Keshmiri, Mohammad Javad Tehrani and Parviz Norouzi, also detained in the Kırklareli Centre; Nader Kazempour Marand and Parviz Ranjbar Shorehdel, currently settled in Kırklareli on the basis of a temporary residence permit; and, Alireza Ranjbar, Pejman Piran, Abolfazl Ajorlu, Seyid Ali Alemzadeh and Mostaba Naderani Vatanpur, currently living in Sweden. Recognised as refugees by the UNHCR (the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees), they all left their country of origin and entered Turkey illegally. Their four cases concern their possible deportation to Tunisia (the first case), Iran or Iraq (the other three cases). They allege that, as members of illegal organisations (Ennahda in the first case, and former members of the People’s Mojahedin Organisation in the second and fourth cases), they would be at real risk of death or ill-treatment if deported. They rely in particular on Articles   2 (right to life), 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) and 13 (right to an effective remedy). In all the cases but one ( Keshmiri ), the applicants also make various complaints under Article   5 (right to liberty and security) about the unlawfulness of their detention pending deportation. The applicants in the cases of Charahili and Tehrani and Others further complain under Article 3 about the conditions of their detention in a police station and certain of the detention centres where they have been held awaiting deportation.     Repetitive case   The following case raises an issue which has already been submitted to the Court.   Çağlar v. Turkey (no. 11192/05) In this case the applicant complains that he was deprived of his property, designated as forest area, without compensation. He relies on Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 (protection of property).     Length-of-proceedings case   In the following case, the applicant complains in particular under Article   6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time) and Article 13 (right to an effective remedy) about the excessive length of civil proceedings.   Ferreira Alves v. Portugal (No. 6) (nos. 46436/06 and 55676/08)     ***   Press contacts Stefano Piedimonte (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 04) Tracey Turner-Tretz (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30) Kristina Pencheva-Malinowski (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 70) Céline Menu-Lange (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 90 21 58 77) Frédéric Dolt (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 90 21 53 39) Nina Salomon (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 49 79)   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.