CEDHPRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
CEDH · PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG — 12 mai 2010
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:003-3131034-3476066
- Date
- 12 mai 2010
- Publication
- 12 mai 2010
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulAnalyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sA678F94A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right; font-size:11pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sC547D3F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:right; font-size:11pt } .s19A99A56 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:17pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s92211FAE { margin-top:17pt; margin-bottom:17pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s33F76D61 { margin-top:17pt; margin-bottom:5pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s9AE6264A { margin-top:5pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4BAE41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt } .sE0D34C67 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sA101A847 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s92A5AB2 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s365FF37E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; font-size:11pt } .s500D534C { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:5pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s18744805 { margin-top:5pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s99A63BFE { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; font-size:11pt } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s4D4F15A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:5pt; text-align:left; font-size:11pt } .s79A77717 { margin-top:5pt; margin-bottom:5pt; text-align:left; font-size:11pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } 386 12.05.2010 Press release issued by the Registrar FORTHCOMING GRAND CHAMBER JUDGMENT 17 May 2010 The European Court of Human Rights will deliver its Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Kononov v. Latvia (no. 36376/04) in a public hearing on Monday 17 May 2010 at 10a.m. – local time – in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg. The press release and the text of the judgment will be available after the hearing on the Court’s Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).   Vasiliy Kononov was born in Latvia in 1923. He was a Latvian national until 12   April   2000, when he was granted Russian nationality. The case concerns Mr Kononov’s conviction in Latvia for war crimes he allegedly committed during World War II. In 1942 he was called up as a soldier in the Soviet Army. In 1943 he was dropped into Belarus territory (under German occupation at the time) near the Latvian border, where he joined a Soviet commando unit composed of members of the “Red Partisans”. According to the facts as established by the competent Latvian courts, on 27   May   1944 Mr Kononov led a unit of Red Partisans wearing German uniforms on an expedition on the village of Mazie Bati, certain of whose inhabitants were suspected of having betrayed to the Germans another group of Red Partisans. In all, nine villagers were killed: six men and three women, one in the final stages of pregnancy. The applicant said that his unit had been instructed to capture those responsible for handing the group of Partisans over to the Germans so that they could be brought to trial. He further claimed that he had not personally led the operation or entered the village.   The applicant complains in particular that the acts of which he had been accused had not, at the time of their commission, constituted an offence under either domestic or international law. He alleges a violation of Article 7 § 1 (no punishment without law) of the European Convention on Human Rights.   The application was lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 27 August 2004.   In a judgment of 24   July 2008 a Chamber of the Court held, by four votes to three, that there had been a violation of Article 7. Under Article 41 (just satisfaction), the Court awarded the applicant, by four votes to three, 30,000   euros   (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage.   On 6 January 2009 the case was referred to the Grand Chamber under Article 43 at the Government’s request. Third-party comments were received from the Government of the Russian Federation and from the Lithuanian Government. On 20 May 2009 a Grand Chamber hearing was held in public in the Human Rights Building in Strasbourg.   ***   Press contacts Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel: + 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30) or Stefano Piedimonte (tel: + 33 (0)3 90 21 42 04) Kristina Pencheva-Malinowski (tel: + 33 (0)3 88 41 35 70) Céline Menu-Lange (tel: + 33 (0)3 90 21 58 77) Frédéric Dolt (tel: + 33 (0)3 90 21 53 39) Nina Salomon (tel: + 33 (0)3 90 21 49 79) The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
- Date
- 12 mai 2010
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:003-3131034-3476066
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel