CEDH · PRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG — 16 juillet 2010

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sA678F94A { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right; font-size:11pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s51D316E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s73AF59F6 { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s15B74CEF { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s11AD46B1 { font-family:Arial; font-size:7.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s4BAE41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt } .sBACB3E60 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; text-decoration:underline; color:#800080 } .s92A5AB2 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s99A63BFE { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left; font-size:11pt } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s7C768949 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0000ff } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sBACB86A2 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } 571 16.07.2010   Press release issued by the Registrar Case concerning collapse of bank in Russia referred to the Grand Chamber     A case concerning the loss of an applicant’s personal savings following the collapse of a bank in Russia has been referred to the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights.   At its last meeting (28 June 2010), the Grand Chamber panel of five judges decided to refer the case – Kotov v. Russia – and to reject requests to refer 44 other cases.   1.     Referral accepted:   Kotov v. Russia (application no. 54522/00)   The applicant, Vladimir Mikhaïlovitch Kotov, is a Russian national born in 1948 and lives in Krasnodar (Russia).   In its judgment of 14 January 2010 , the Court unanimously held that there had been violation of Article 1 of Protocol no. 1 (protection of property) to the European Convention on Human Rights. The case was referred to the Grand Chamber at the Russian Government’s request.     2.     Referral rejected:   Judgments in the following 44 cases are now final [1] .   Družstevní Záložna Pria and others v. Czech Republic (72034/01), judgment of 21   January   2010   Chesnyak v. Ukraine (1809/03), judgment of 18 February 2010   Makarenko v. Russia (5962/03), judgment of 22 December 2009   Volnykh v. Russia (10856/03), judgment of 17 December 2009   Mole v. Italy (24421/03), judgment of 12 January 2010   Kalanoski v. “the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (31391/03), judgment of 17   December   2009   Jovanoski v. “the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” (31731/03), judgment of 7   January   2010   Mariana Marinescu v. Romania (36110/03), judgment of 2   February   2010   Yelena Ivanova v. Ukraine (4640/04), judgment of 18 February 2010   Andreescu Murăreţ and others v. Romania (4867/04), judgment of 19   January 2010   Rostunova v. Ukraine (20165/04), judgment of 18 February 2010   Railean v. Moldova (23401/04), judgment of 5 January 2010   Nurten Deniz Bülbül v. Turkey (4649/05), judgment of 23 February 2010   Hussun and others v. Italy (10171/05, 10601/05, 11593/05 and 17165/05), judgment of 19   January 2010   Yardimci v. Turkey (25266/05), judgment of 5 January 2010   Lewicki v. Pologne (28993/05), judgment of 6 October 2009   Popović v. Serbia (33888/05), judgment of 24 November 2009   Sampaio de Lemos and others v. Portugal (41954/05, 42843/05, 3761/06, 6319/06, 6323/06, 7349/06, 7355/06, 7503/06, 8048/06, 10906/06, 11829/06, 11840/06, 12962/06, 14075/06, 14094/06, 14103/06, 14111/06, 15195/06, 15251/06, 16200/06, 19455/06, 24690/06 and 27603/06), judgment of 15   December 2009   Aizpurua Ortiz and others v. Spain (42430/05), judgment of 2 February 2010   Brożyna v. Poland (7147/06), judgment of 2 February 2010   Tapia Gasca et D. v. Spain (20272/06), judgment of 22 December 2009   Chaudet v. France (49037/06), judgment of 29 October 2009   Alfantakis v. Greece (49330/07), judgment of 11 February 2010   V.D. v. Romania (7078/02), judgment of 16 February 2010   Aleksandr Zaichenko v. Russia (39660/02), judgment of 18 February 2010   Skorobogatykh v. Russia (4871/03), judgment of 22 December 2009   Zakayev and Safanova v.Russia (11870/03), judgment of 11 February 2010   Keçeli and Başpinar v. Turkey (21426/03), judgment of 26 January 2010   Malysh and others v. Russia (30280/03), judgment of 11 February 2010   Sabirov v. Russia (13465/04), judgment of 11 February 2010   Fedchenko v. Russia (33333/04), judgment of 11 February 2010   Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom (4158/05), judgment of 12 January 2010   Zalevskaya v. Russia (23333/05), judgment of 11 February 2010   Dubayev and Bersnukayeva v. Russia (30613/05 et 30615/05), judgment of 11   February   2010   Iriskhanova and Iriskhanov v. Russia (35869/05), judgment of 18 February 2010   Fedchencko v. Russie (no. 2) (48195/06), judgment of 11 February 2010   Čolić and others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1218/07, 1270/07, 1242/07, 1335/07, 1368/07, 1369/07, 3424/07, 3428/07, 3430/07, 3935/07, 3940/07, 7194/07, 7204/07, 7206/07 and 7211/07), judgment of 10 November 2009   Guluyeva and others v. Russia (1675/07), judgment of 11   February   2010   Tarnopolskaya and others v. Russia (11093/07, 14558/07, 19660/07, 30166/07, 46736/07, 52681/07, 52985/07, 10633/08, 10652/08, 12694/08, 15437/08, 16691/08, 19447/07, 19457/08, 20857/08, 20872/08, 22546/08, 25820/08, 25839/08 and 25845/08), judgment of 9 July 2009   Syngelidis v. Greece (24895/07), judgment of 11 February 2010   Dimopoulos v. Greece (34198/07), judgment of 7 January 2010   Dzhurayev v. Russia (38124/07), judgment of 17 December 2009   Z.N.S. v. Turkey (21896/08), judgment of 19 January 2010   Nazmi Apaydin v. Turkey (33742/05), judgment of 19 January 2010   ****   The press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions, judgments and further information about the Court can be found on its Internet site ( www.echr.coe.int ). To receive the Court’s press releases, you can subscribe to the Court’s RSS feeds .   Press contacts [email protected] / +33 3 90 21 42 08 Emma Hellyer (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 42 15) or   Tracey Turner-Trandz (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 30)   Kristina Pencheva-Malino.wski (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 88 41 35 70)   Céline Menu-Lange (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 58 77)   Frédéric Dolt (telephone: 00 33 (0)3 90 21 53 39) Nina Salomon (telephone : 00 33 (0)3 90 21 49 79)   The European Court of Human Rights was sand up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe Member States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights. [1] Under Article 44 § 2 (c) of the European Convention on Human Rights, the judgment of a Chamber becomes final when the panel of the Grand Chamber rejects the request to refer under Article 43