CEDH · PRESS;GENERAL;ENG — 23 octobre 2001

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s94935B0F { width:389.85pt; display:inline-block } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s33165EBA { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sD1DF4F9E { width:335.56pt; display:inline-block } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s85016119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } .s8C2F776C { width:255.15pt; display:inline-block } .sF2CFA36E { width:35.36pt; display:inline-block } .sE5D228E7 { width:68.04pt; display:inline-block } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s938C1CCA { padding-right:5.4pt; padding-left:5.4pt; vertical-align:top } .s85646119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .s352FB0A7 { height:17.25pt } .sCA7EE78A { height:16.5pt } .sF88AB0A7 { height:15.75pt } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s37CDBE05 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sCB27B9E { width:16.66pt; display:inline-block } .sC5412BEF { width:51.05pt; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS     757   23.10.2001   Press release issued by the Registrar   CHAMBER JUDGMENTS CONCERNING Italy   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following 34 Chamber judgments, none of which is final [1] :   SECTION 3     Violation Article 6 §1 In the following thirty-four Italian cases, the applicants, all Italian nationals complained about the length of the civil proceedings to which they were parties. They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, claiming their civil rights were not decided within a reasonable time.   In each case, the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and awarded each applicant the following amounts in Italian lire (ITL) for non-pecuniary damage, costs and expenses. (The judgments are available only in French).   Non-pecuniary   costs and   Damage   expenses (1)     Scannella v. Italy (application no. 44489/98)     (2)     Gusso and Grasso v. Italy (no. 44502/98) ITL 10,000,000   (3)     Squillante v. Italy (no. 44503/98) ITL 10,000,000 ITL     730,700 (4)     G. and C.C v. Italy (no. 44510/98)     (5)     Greco v. Italy (no. 44512/98) ITL 12,000,000 ITL 4,000,000 (6)     Iezzi and Cerritelli v. Italy (no. 44514/98) ITL 12,000,000 ITL 1,500,000 (7)     L. v. Italy (no. 44515/98) ITL 20,000,000 ITL 5,000,000 (8)     Carrone v. Italy (no. 44516/98) ITL 30,000,000 ITL 2,000,000 (9)     Ragas v. Italy (no. 44524/98) ITL 40,000,000 ITL 4,000,000 (10)     R. P and others v. Italy (no. 44526/98) ITL 20,000,000   (11)     Pezzuto v. Italy (no. 44529/98) ITL 10,000,000 ITL 3,000,000 (12)     Colacrai v. Italy (no. 44532/98) ITL 10,000,000   (13)     D.I v. Italy (no. 44533/98) ITL 70,000,000 ITL     525,500 (14)     Aresu v. Italy   (no. 44628/98) ITL    8,000,000 ITL 3,000,000 (15)     Tartaglia v. Italy (no. 48402/99) ITL 14,000,000 ITL 3,000,000 (16)     Minici v. Italy (no. 48403/99) ITL 15,000,000 ITL 5,000,000 (17)     Dragonetti v. Italy (no. 48404/99) ITL 10,000,000 ITL 1,000,000 (18)     Lucio Mario Catillo v. Italy (no. 48405/99) ITL 10,000,000 ITL 3,000,000 (19)     Stefanucci v. Italy (no. 48406/99) ITL 20,000,000 ITL 1,000,000 (20)     Calò v. Italy (no. 48408/99) ITL 20,000,000 ITL 5,000,000 (21)     Reino v. Italy (no. 48409/99) ITL 25,000,000 ITL 3,000,000 (22)     Tozzi v. Italy (no. 48410/99) ITL 15,000,000 ITL 3,000,000 (23)     Ar.M . v. Italy (no. 48412/99) ITL 10,000,000 ITL 4,000,000 (24)     Morese v. Italy no. 2 (no. 48413/99) ITL 30,000,000   (25)     Carlucci v. Italy (no. 48414/99) ITL 20,000,000 ITL 3,000,000 (26)     Siena v. Italy (no. 48415/99) ITL 20,000,000 ITL 4,000,000 (27)     Corcelli v. Italy (no. 48416/99) ITL 12,000,000   (28)     Molè v. Italy (no. 48417/99) ITL 45,000,000   (29)     Cesaro v. Italy (no. 48418/99) ITL 15,000,000 ITL 4,000,000 (30)     Buonocore v. Italy (no. 48419/99) ITL 20,000,000 ITL 4,000,000 (31)     Efisio Pisano v. Italy (no. 48420/99) ITL 20,000,000 ITL 2,000,000 (32)     Altomonte v. Italy (no. 48421/99) ITL 20,000,000 ITL 4,000,000 (33)     E.I . v. Italy (no. 48422/99) ITL 6,000,000 ITL 4,000,000 (34)     Campana v. Italy (no. 48423/99) ITL 20,000,000 ITL 5,000,000   ***   The Court’s judgments are accessible on its Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).   Registry of the European Court of Human Rights F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex Contacts:   Roderick Liddell (telephone: (0)3 88 41 24 92)   Emma Hellyer (telephone: (0)3 90 21 42 15) Fax: (0)3 88 41 27 91   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights. On 1 November 1998 a full-time Court was established, replacing the original two-tier system of a part-time Commission and Court. [1] Under Article 43 of the European Convention on Human Rights, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17-member Grand Chamber of the Court.   In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its Protocols, or a serious issue of general importance, in which case the Grand Chamber will deliver a final judgment. If no such question or issue arises, the panel will reject the request, at which point the judgment becomes final. Otherwise Chamber judgments become final on the expiry of the three-month period or earlier if the parties declare that they do not intend to make a request to refer.