CEDH · PRESS;GENERAL;ENG — 10 juin 1999

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s94935B0F { width:389.85pt; display:inline-block } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s33165EBA { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s8AFB426F { width:32.67pt; display:inline-block } .s98A7B623 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s37CDBE05 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sCB27B9E { width:16.66pt; display:inline-block } .s8242CF8E { width:39.05pt; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s4BAE41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt } .sE3CBA86F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:11pt } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS             321   10.6.1999   Press release issued by the Registrar   ADMISSIBILITY DECISION IN THE CASE OF L. v. FINLAND       The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section) has declared partly admissible the application in the case of L. v. Finland (application no.   25651/94), following an in camera hearing on Tuesday 8 June 1999.   The applicants     The case concerns an application brought by a father and grandfather, both Finnish nationals, whose identities are confidential [1] 1 .   Summary of the facts     In 1992 the applicant father’s two daughters were placed provisionally in public care and then with a foster family, on account of long-standing family problems. The father was allowed access to them only a few times a year and the grandfather was barred from seeing them. The applicants made various unsuccessful appeals against these decisions and called for a care plan to be adopted to reunite their family. Their access restrictions remain unchanged.   Complaints declared admissible     The applicants complain that their right to family life, guaranteed under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and their right to an effective remedy, under Article 13, have been violated, as the measures taken by the Finnish authorities were not designed to reunite their family.       They also complain of a violation of their right to a fair trial, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, as the County Administrative Court refused to hold an oral hearing concerning their case. Procedure     The application was lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 7   September 1994. On 1 November 1998, in accordance with Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11 to the Convention, the case was transferred to the Court.     Composition of the Court     The Chamber of the Fourth Section hearing the case is composed as follows:   Georg Ress (German), President , Matti Pellonpää (Finnish), Ireneu Cabral Barreto (Portuguese), Volodymyr Butkevych (Ukrainian), Nina Vajić (Croatian), John Hedigan (Irish), Snejana Botoucharova (Bulgarian), Judges, Antonio Pastor Ridruejo (Spanish), Lucius Caflisch [1] (Swiss) Jerzy Makarczyk (Polish), Substitute Judges,   and also Vincent Berger , Section Registrar .     ***   Registry of the European Court of Human Rights F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex Contacts:   Roderick Liddell (telephone: (0)3 88 41 24 92) or   Emma Hellyer (telephone: (0)3 90 21 42 15) Fax: (0)3 88 41 27 91       The European Court of Human Rights was set up in 1959 in Strasbourg to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   On November 1 1998 a permanent Court was established, replacing the original two-tier system of a part-time Court and Commission.   1 On 11 May 1999 the Vice-President of the Fourth Section acting as President of the Chamber decided, in accordance with Rule 33 §§ 3 and 4 of the Rules of Court, that the identity of the applicants should remain confidential and that the documents in the case file should be inaccessible to the public. The decision was made in the children’s interests.       [1] Elected as the judge in respect of Liechtenstein