CEDH · PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG — 28 avril 2000

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s94935B0F { width:389.85pt; display:inline-block } .s5F1C7C86 { width:6.15pt; display:inline-block } .s98A7B623 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s9AFF8173 { width:17.68pt; display:inline-block } .sCF3E9788 { width:162.22pt; display:inline-block } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE267CAE6 { width:134.89pt; display:inline-block } .s47425F00 { width:144.23pt; display:inline-block } .sE42762C3 { width:150.25pt; display:inline-block } .sFC100D0D { width:146.92pt; display:inline-block } .s9930D6B5 { width:128.25pt; display:inline-block } .s467EEDFE { width:167.55pt; display:inline-block } .sC2BE43C6 { width:175.58pt; display:inline-block } .s8DB19A51 { width:86.24pt; display:inline-block } .sCB27B9E { width:16.66pt; display:inline-block } .s147A4AAD { width:18pt; display:inline-block } .s8AFB426F { width:32.67pt; display:inline-block } .s68BA453A { width:7.99pt; display:inline-block } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS       292     28.4.2000   Press release issued by the Registrar   CHAMBER JUDGMENTS   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following nine chamber judgments concerning Italy .   Section 4   1)   Vero v. Italy (no. 41818/98)   Violation Article 6 § 1   Francesco Vero, an Italian national, complained about civil proceedings to which he was a party, which lasted twenty-five years and seven months. The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human Rights and awarded the applicant 80,000,000 Italian lira (ITL) for non-pecuniary damage. The judgment is available only in French.   2)   Sinagoga v. Italy (no. 41820/98)   Violation Article 6 § 1   Domenico Sinagoga, an Italian national, complained about civil proceedings to which he was a party, which lasted over twelve years and nine months. The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant ITL 30,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage. (Judgment in French).   3)   Cardillo v. Italy (no. 41833/98)   Violation Article 6 § 1   Ottaviano Ascanio Italo Cardillo, an Italian national, complained about civil proceedings to which he was a party, which lasted over twenty-five years and four months. The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant ITL   70,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage. (Judgment in French).   4)   T. v. Italy (no. 1) (no. 41834/98)   Friendly settlement   M. T., an Italian national, complained about civil proceedings to which she was a party, which lasted six years and ten months. The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which Ms T is to be paid ITL 10,000,000 for any non-pecuniary damage and ITL   3,000,000 for costs and expenses. (Judgment in French).   5)   T. v. Italy (no. 2) (no. 41836/98)   Friendly settlement   M. T., an Italian national, complained about civil proceedings to which she was a party, which lasted over nine years and six months. The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which Ms T is to be paid ITL 13,000,000 for any non-pecuniary damage and ITL   3,000,000 for costs and expenses. (Judgment in French).     6)   Di Antonio v. Italy (no. 41839/98)   Violation Article 6 § 1   Domenico Di Antonio, an Italian national, complained about civil proceedings to which he was a party, which lasted over five years and eight months. The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant ITL   13,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 3,000,000 for costs and expenses. (Judgment in French).   7)   Vay v. Italy (no. 41841/98)   Violation Article 6 § 1   Anna Maria Vay, an Italian national, complained about civil proceedings to which she was a party, which lasted over six years and two months. The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded the applicant ITL   17,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 3,000,000 for costs and expenses. (Judgment in French).   8)   Tolli v. Italy (no. 41842/98)   Friendly settlement   Fausto Tolli, an Italian national, complained about civil proceedings to which he was a party, which lasted over fourteen years. The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which Mr Tolli is to be paid ITL 13,000,000 for any non-pecuniary damage and ITL   3,000,000 for costs and expenses. (Judgment in French).   9)   Capurro and Tosetti v. Italy (no. 45071/98)   Friendly settlement   Marcella Capurro, Massimo Tosetti, Marina Tosetti and Maura Tosetti, four Italian nationals, complained about civil proceedings to which they were a party, which lasted nine years and nine months. The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which the applicants are each to be paid ITL   29,000,000 for any non-pecuniary damage and ITL   1,250,000 for costs and expenses. (Judgment in French).     ***   The Court’s judgments are accessible on its Internet site (http://www.echr.coe.int).   Registry of the European Court of Human Rights F - 67075 Strasbourg Cedex Contacts:   Roderick Liddell (telephone: (0)3 88 41 24 92) Or:     Emma Hellyer (telephone: (0)3 90 21 42 15) Fax:     (0)3 88 41 27 91   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in 1959 in Strasbourg to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   On 1 November 1998 a full-time Court was established, replacing the original two-tier system of a part-time Commission and Court.