CEDH · PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG — 20 juillet 2000

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s78179214 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; line-height:95% } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s2B794F18 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; line-height:95% } .s94935B0F { width:389.85pt; display:inline-block } .s72BA45F0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; line-height:95%; font-size:11pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s85016119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:11pt } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .s6D0AE0DF { width:18.57pt; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s11AD46B1 { font-family:Arial; font-size:7.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s81628E9B { width:25.01pt; display:inline-block } .s23A41E03 { width:36pt; display:inline-block } .sAD8D8B0 { width:29.89pt; display:inline-block } .sC204099B { width:18.27pt; display:inline-block } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .s6BFAA052 { width:21.28pt; display:inline-block } .s97038F6C { width:19.5pt; display:inline-block } .sDE095A02 { width:32.94pt; display:inline-block } .s1C79B3AB { width:10.33pt; display:inline-block } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS     544   20.7.2000   Press release issued by the Registrar   CHAMBER JUDGMENTS CONCERNING FRANCE AND ITALY   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing chamber judgments in the following cases:   1)   Antonetto v. Italy [1] 1 (application no. 15918/89)                Violation Articles 6 & 1 of Protocol   No. 1   Irma Antonetto, an Italian national, complained, under Article 6 (right to a fair trial) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property) of the European Convention on Human Rights, about the impossibility of enforcing a judgment by the Conseil d’Etat to demolish a building built illegally next to her property. The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Articles 6 and 1 of Protocol No.1 and awarded Ms Antonetto 100,000,000 Italian lire (ITL) for pecuniary damage, ITL 15,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 24,352,000 for costs and expenses. The judgment exists only in French.   2)   Abbas v. France (no. 35783/97)                    Friendly settlement   Abdelghani Abbas, an Algerian national born in 1966, complained under Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the Convention that, after having been expelled from France with a three-year residence prohibition, he was refused re-entry three years later. The Court has agreed to strike out the case following a friendly settlement in which Mr Abbas has been granted a year’s renewable residence permit. Judgment in French.   3)   N’Diaye v. France (no. 41735/98)                Friendly settlement   Wagui N’Diaye, a French national, complained under Article 6 § 1 (right to determination of civil rights within a reasonable time) about the length of the industrial tribunal proceedings concerning his wrongful dismissal, which lasted more than five years. The Court has agreed to strike out the case following a friendly settlement in which Mr N’Diaye is to be paid 30,000 French francs. Judgment in French.   *** Registry of the European Court of Human Rights F - 67075 Strasbourg Cedex Contacts:   Roderick Liddell (telephone: (0)3 88 41 24 92) Or:     Emma Hellyer (telephone: (0)3 90 21 42 15) Fax:     (0)3 88 41 27 91   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in 1959 in Strasbourg to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.   On 1 November 1998 a full-time Court was established, replacing the original two-tier system of a part-time   1 Under Article 43 of the European Convention on Human Rights, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17-member Grand Chamber of the Court.   In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its Protocols, or a serious issue of general importance, in which case the Grand Chamber will deliver a final judgment. If no such question or issue arises, the panel will reject the request, at which point the judgment becomes final. Otherwise Chamber judgments become final on the expiry of the three-month period or earlier if the parties declare that they do not intend to make a request to refer.