CEDHPRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
CEDH · PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG — 29 mai 2001
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:003-68359-68827
- Date
- 29 mai 2001
- Publication
- 29 mai 2001
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulAnalyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s94935B0F { width:389.85pt; display:inline-block } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s11AD46B1 { font-family:Arial; font-size:7.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s4DDA3AA3 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; font-style:italic } .sADADF4A7 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s33141CA1 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:10pt } .sB4D5CB4E { width:4.94pt; display:inline-block } .sC5412BEF { width:51.05pt; display:inline-block } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sF6A12959 { width:33%; height:1px; text-align:left } .s653E6C45 { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS   378   29.5.2001   Press release issued by the Registrar   CHAMBER JUDGMENT CONCERNING AUSTRIA   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following Chamber judgment [1] :   Section 3   Franz Fischer v. Austria (application no. 37950/97)     Violation Article 4 Protocol No.7   Franz Fischer, an Austrian national, while driving under the influence of alcohol, knocked down a cyclist who was fatally injured. After hitting the cyclist, the applicant drove off without giving assistance and only gave himself up to the police later that night. On 13 December 1996 he was found guilty of a number of traffic offences, including driving under the influence of drink, and fined 22,010 Austrian schillings (ATS) with 20 days’ imprisonment in default. On 18 March 1997 he was also convicted of causing death by negligence “after allowing himself to become intoxicated through the consumption of alcohol” and sentenced to six months’ imprisonment.   The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of   Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 (right not to be tried or punished twice) of the European Convention on Human Rights and that the finding of a violation constituted in itself sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage the applicant may have sustained. The Court awarded ATS 68,642 for costs and expenses. (The judgment is available only in English.)     *** The Court’s judgments are accessible on its Internet site ( http://www.echr.coe.int ).   Registry of the European Court of Human Rights F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex Contacts:   Roderick Liddell (telephone: (0)3 88 41 24 92)   Emma Hellyer (telephone: (0)3 90 21 42 15) Fax: (0)3 88 41 27 91   The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights. On 1 November 1998 a full-time Court was established, replacing the original two-tier system of a part-time Commission and Court. [1] Under Article 43 of the European Convention on Human Rights, within three months from the date of a Chamber judgment, any party to the case may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17-member Grand Chamber of the Court.   In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its Protocols, or a serious issue of general importance, in which case the Grand Chamber will deliver a final judgment. If no such question or issue arises, the panel will reject the request, at which point the judgment becomes final. Otherwise Chamber judgments become final on the expiry of the three-month period or earlier if the parties declare that they do not intend to make a request to refer.  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
- Date
- 29 mai 2001
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:003-68359-68827
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel